Due to cessation of funding, this
set of pages is not updated or
maintained after October 1, 2002. |
Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program (HTPCP) Analysis and Synthesis Project
The HTPCP evaluation is part of MCHB's larger effort to document the impact of its investment in Title V Block Grant programs and its discretionary grant programs. In particular, MCHB is interested in measuring the impact of SPRANS, which comprise an array of demonstration, research, and training grants. NCEMCH was awarded a grant that includes as one of its objectives the development of a model for evaluating SPRANS programs, beginning with the HTPCP. This study also examines progress toward goals specific to the HTPCP.
The HTPCP was initiated in 1989 to engage communities in working to improve children's health through prevention and better access to health care. The program is funded by MCHB of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). It is administered by MCHB in partnership with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The concerted effort to blend public health resources with the knowledge and skills of the pediatric professional community is a hallmark of HTPCP. To date, 107 projects nationwide have been awarded 5-year grants; 54 have completed the federal funding cycle.
The entire report of findings from the analysis, titled The Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program in Review: Analysis and Findings of a Descriptive Survey (845K, 98 pages) or only the Executive Summary from the report (6 pages, 132K) can be downloaded here as portable document format (PDF) files and read with Adobe Acrobat Reader
MCHB Training Program Synthesis and Analysis Project
The
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health (NCEMCH) has
completed an evaluation of the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Training
Program, which is funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB). The MCH Training Program: An Evaluation is the product of phase
II of the evaluation. Phase II builds on phase I, the results of which
were published in Building the Future: The Maternal and Child Health
Training Program in March 2000.
During phase I of the evaluation 13 long-term training priorities were described: Behavioral Pediatrics, Communication Disorders, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Leadership Education in Adolescent Health (LEAH), Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND), Nursing, Nutrition, Pediatric Dentistry, Pediatric Occupational Therapy, Pediatric Physical Therapy, Pediatric Pulmonary Centers, Schools of Public Health, and Social Work. In addition, the evolution of the priorities was traced, and common themes among training projects were identified. Phase II included an analysis of the distinguishing characteristics of each training priority, an assessment of MCH Training Program accomplishments, and the development of recommendations to help MCHB assess MCH training grants in the future.
Findings from phase II of the evaluation include the following:
The full report and The MCH Training Program: An EvaluationExecutive Summary can be downloaded as PDF files and read using Adobe® Acrobat® Reader®. Also available for downloading are technical documents used during the evaluation, such as the record review data collection form, site visit interview questions, Title V director focus group questions, and former trainee interview questions, as well as the findings of phase I of the evaluation and individual training priority fact sheets.
Table of Contents
In Memoriam vi |
|
Chapter
1: Introduction and Methodology
1
Background
2
The Training Program and the MCH Mission
3
Goals of the MCH Training Program
5
Needs Addressed by the MCH Training Program
7
Focusing the Evaluation
9
Study Methodologies
9
Summary
13 |
|
Chapter
2: A Statistical Snapshot of the MCH Training Program
15
MCH Training Program Expenditures
16
Resources Devoted to Trainees
16
Resources Utilized for Faculty Leadership
19
Distribution of MCH Training Program Grants
21
Summary
24 |
|
Chapter
3: Training for Leadership
27
Differences in Leadership Training Among
Projects 28
Aspects of Training for Leadership
31
Assessing Project Success in Training
Leaders 33
Summary
44 |
|
Chapter
4: Supporting Faculty in Leadership Roles
47
The MCH Training Program Model of Leadership
Versus the University Model of Scholarship 48
Collaboration and the Interdisciplinary
Approach 49
Fostering Change Within Universities
50
The Need for MCH Faculty Leaders
51
Summary
52 |
|
Chapter
5: Contributing to Advances in the Field
53
Nurturing New Professional Subspecialties
54
Influencing Professional Associations
54
Developing Innovations in Treatment and
Services 55
Serving as a Voice for Children
56
Encouraging Research
58
Fostering Diversity
59
Summary
61 |
|
Chapter
6: Promoting Collaboration
63
Technical Assistance, Consultation, and
Continuing Education
64
Collaboration Across Projects and with
Nonfunded Universities
67
Collaboration with Title V Programs
68
Summary
71 |
|
Chapter
7: The Economics of MCH Training
73
The Role of Tuition in Academic Decision-Making
74
The Role of Other Funding Sources in Academic
Decision-Making
76
The Impact of Reimbursement on Clinical
Training 77
Leveraging of MCH Training Program Grants
79
Summary
81 |
|
Chapter
8: Recommendations
83
Planning, Assessment, and Evaluation
84
Portfolio Policies
87
Budget Policies and Guidelines
90
Program Stewardship
91
Conclusion
96 |
|
Notes
99
Bibliography 103
Appendices
A: MCH Training Program Evaluation Project
Advisory Committee Members
109
B: Site-Visited Projects and Project Directors
111
C: Additional Information on Interviews
with Former Trainees
115
Tables
Table 1: Maternal and Child Health Bureau
Long-Term Training Program Priorities, FY 1999
17
Table 2: Median Awards by Priority Area,
FY 1999 19
Table 3: Trainees Supported by MCH Training
Grants, FY 1999
20
Table 4: Faculty Supported by MCH Training
Grants, FY 1999
23
Table 5: Demographics of Former Trainee
Sample and Respondents
118
Table 6: Current Employment of Former
Trainees 119
Table 7: Former Trainees' Participation
in Leadership Activities
120
Figures
Figure 1: MCH Pyramid
4
Figure 2: MCH Training Program Logic Model
10
Figure 3: Allocation of Training Program
Funds Among Priorities, FY 1999
22
Figure 4: Training Program Grantee Budgets,
FY 1999 22
Figure 5: MCHB Training Grant Sites, FY
1999 25
Figure 6: Former Trainees Still Practicing
in MCH Field
36
Figure 7: Job Change After Completing
MCH Training
37
Figure 8: Job Change Attributed to MCH
Training 38
Figure 9: Former Trainees Who Had a Faculty
Mentor 38
Figure 10: Importance of Faculty Mentoring
to Former Trainees' Careers
39
Figure 11: Former Trainees Who Received
Continued Mentoring After Training
40
Figure 12: Former Trainees Who Consider
Themselves a Leader in the Field
40
Figure 13: Leadership by Cohort
41
Figure 14: Examples of Leadership Activities
of Former Trainees
42
Figure 15: Examples of Recent Leadership
Activities of MCH
Training Program Grant Faculty 55
Figure 16: Examples of Treatment and Service
Innovations
56
Figure 17: Examples of Policy Work of
Grantees 57
Figure 18: Publications Produced by Supported
Faculty and Trainees, FY 1999
58
Figure 19: Technical Assistance, Consultation,
and Continuing Education Examples
66
Figure 20: Examples of University-Based
Collaborations
69
Figure 21: Examples of Consultation with
Nonfunded Universities
70
Figure 22: Examples of Collaborations
Between Title V Offices and MCH Training
Program Projects 71 |
552K |
||
|
Training Priority Fact Sheets |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
24K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) |
32K |
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |
|
|
28K |