
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
and Unexpected Infant/Child and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at
Georgetown University. This
and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
July 30, 2010
Multimedia Featured Resource: The Juvenile Products Manufacturing
Association (JPMA), in collaboration with association, medical, media,
and manufacturer partners, has launched a new campaign to educate
parents and caregivers about the importance of creating a safe sleep
environment for infants and young children. The campaign Web site
contains a series of videos demonstrating safe sleep practices; safety
tips; news; and brochures and other campaign partner resources on
juvenile product safety. Information on crib parts, hardware, and
assembly instructions; a list of sleep-related infant product recalls;
and recommendations for preventing sudden infant death syndrome and
sudden unexpected infant death are included. The Web site also
contains information on Baby Safety Month, which is sponsored annually
in September by JPMA. The Web site is available at http://www.cribsafety.org
1. New Bibliography Features Articles on Sudden
Unexpected Infant Death
2. Home Visiting Resources Focus on Needs Assessment and
Evaluation
3. Article Explores Behaviors and
Practices Related to Tummy Time
4. Authors Describe Community-Based Approach to
Understanding and Addressing Infant Mortality
5. Study Examines Use of Infant Car Seats Outside the Car
************************************************************
1. NEW BIBLIOGRAPHY FEATURES ARTICLES ON SUDDEN UNEXPECTED INFANT
DEATH
Sudden Unexpected Infant Death: A Selected Annotated Bibliography cites
recent journal articles on sudden unexpected (or unexplained) infant
death from MEDLINE and other life science journals. The bibliography
contains citations from PubMed (a service of the National Library of
Medicine) selected by staff of the National Sudden and Unexpected
Infant-Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center. Topics include
management and public health issues and causes of sudden infant death
that have been identified or hypothesized. The bibliography also
includes a tool customized to search PubMed for additional articles on
this topic. The bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/UnexpectedDeath.html
************************************************************
2. HOME VISITING RESOURCES FOCUS ON NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION
Child Trends recently released two new resources on home visiting. The
resources include the following:
* Home Visiting Application Process: A Guide For Planning State Needs
Assessments. This brief outlines steps and components for completing
the grant-application process for the Maternal, Infant, and Early
Childhood Home Visiting Program as outlined by the authoring
legislation or guidance offered by the Health Resources and Services
Administration and the Administration for Children and Families. It
provides resource information that can be used in planning and
conducting the needs assessment, identifying high-risk populations, and
selecting and measuring benchmarks. Information on state data sources
and statistics is included. The brief is available at http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2010_06_30_Home_Visiting_Guide.pdf
* What Works for Home Visiting Programs: Lessons from Experimental
Evaluations of Programs and Interventions. This fact sheet presents
findings from 66 random assignment experimental evaluations of home
visiting programs to examine the impact of various home visiting
approaches on a wide range of outcomes. The authors identify programs
that work, as well as the intervention strategies that contribute to
program success. The fact sheet is available at http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2010_7_1_FS_WWHomeVisitpdf.pdf
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE EXPLORES BEHAVIORS AND PRACTICES RELATED TO TUMMY TIME
"Outcomes [of this study] suggest that with the implementation of BTS
[Back to Sleep] guidelines, there has been a lack of clarity and
education for both parents and providers about the importance of TT
[tummy time] when young infants are awake," write the authors of an
article published in the July 2010 issue of the Journal of Pediatric
Health Care. Since 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics has
recommended that all infants be placed supine for sleep to prevent
sudden infant death syndrome. The purpose of the exploratory study
described in this article was to assess parental and health
professional behaviors and practices related to infant positioning,
including BTS and TT, during early infancy. The study also explored
parental information and informational sources during the early
postpartum period, as well as health professional beliefs and practices
related to infant positioning early in life.
Parental data for the study were gathered by survey methodology, health
professional data were obtained through focus group methodology, and
Internet data were compiled through an analysis of popular parenting
Web sites. The convenience sample consisted of two groups of
participants: 119 newly delivered mothers from an urban hospital
postpartum unit and nine health professionals (three physicians, one
pediatric nurse practitioner, two registered nurses, and three licensed
practical nurses) from a clinic in the same city. When the infant was
age 2 months, the mothers were contacted by phone and interviewed; 88
participants were reached.
The authors found that
- At time 1 (immediately postpartum), approximately 95 mothers (80
percent) had received information on positioning the infant on his or
her back while asleep; 19 (15 percent) had received information on
positioning the infant on his or her abdomen. Fifty-three (45 percent)
had received no information on positioning when the infant was awake
and no information on TT.
- Mothers' main source of information on infant positioning was
nurses on the postpartum floor, followed by the hospital physician. No
mothers noted the Internet as a source of information.
- At time 2 (2 months postpartum), 26.44 percent of the mothers had
received information about awake-time infant positioning, compared with
83.72 percent who had received information on sleep-time positioning.
- Main sources of instruction on infant positioning were once again
nurses and physicians. Twelve percent of mothers had used the Internet
as a source.
- At time 2, most mothers (71 percent) put their infant in TT two
times per day or less, and more than half of the infants were in TT for
3 to 5 minutes or less.
- Focus groups identified the following barriers among health
professionals to counseling parents about TT: availability of time,
confusion about the guidelines, and legal implications. Family barriers
to implementing TT were confusion, fear, the infant's frustration with
TT, and cultural practices.
The authors conclude that "in addition to highlighting the need for
future research on parental understanding about infant positioning,
this study also suggests the need for future research to provide an
evidence base for TT education for parents of young children and for
the possibility of a marketing campaign to better educate parents about
this important aspect of infant care."
Koren A, Reece SM, Kahn-D'angelo L, et al. 2010. Parental information
and behaviors and provider practices related to tummy time and back to
sleep. Journal of Pediatric Health Care 24(4):222-230. Abstract
available at http://www.jpedhc.org/article/S0891-5245%2809%2900139-4/abstract
Readers: More information is available from the National Sudden and
Unexpected Infant/Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at
Georgetown University as follows:
- Safe Sleep Environment at
http://www.sidscenter.org/SafeSleep/index.html
- Tummy Time (A-Z Topic) at
http://www.sidscenter.org/AZtopics/T.html#t3
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS DESCRIBE COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING AND
ADDRESSING INFANT MORTALITY
"Since its introduction to US urban communities a decade ago, the PPOR
[Perinatal Periods of Risk] approach has become an important component
of local MCH [maternal and child health] practice for improving MCH
outcomes," state the authors of an article published in the Maternal
and Child Health Journal online (ahead of print) on July 3, 2010. To
carry out core public health functions, MCH programs need health
assessment and planning approaches that help identify gaps, target
inquiry, and suggest interventions. Moving from data and analysis to
measurably improving perinatal outcomes in urban areas has been
hampered in part by insufficient community engagement, limitations of
available data, and complexity of the problems being addressed. It can
be difficult for some community partners to understand complex public
health problems like infant mortality. Public health approaches to
reducing infant mortality historically have not fully involved
community-based partners in the process of data collection, analysis,
interpretation, and dissemination. PPOR offers a comprehensive
community-based approach for translating data into strategic actions to
improve women’s and infants' health. The article describes the history,
purpose, and methods of the PPOR approach.
The authors note that PPOR is based on core principles of full
community engagement and equity and follows a six-stage community-
based planning process. The six stages of the PPOR approach are as
follows:
- In Stage 1, communities are mobilized and engaged, related
planning efforts are aligned, and community and analytic readiness are
assessed.
- In Stage 2, feto-infant mortality is mapped, excess mortality is
estimated, likely causes of feto-infant mortality are determined, and
appropriate actions are suggested.
- Stage 3 produces action plans for targeted prevention strategies.
- Stages 4 and 5 include implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
- Stage 6 fosters political will to sustain efforts.
"The PPOR approach's sequential stages chart a course for moving from
information to intervention," state the authors. "Its conceptual
framework, staged approach, and accompanying tools provide local public
health practitioners in more populous jurisdictions new ways to engage
their communities in lowering feto-infant mortality and improving women
and infant's health," they conclude.
Peck MG, Sappenfield WM, Skala J. 2010. Perinatal periods of risk: A
community approach for using data to improve women and infants' health.
Maternal and Child Health Journal [published online ahead of print on
July 3, 2010]. Abstract available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/l047x32023497845
Readers: The authors of the article also describe opportunities for
using the PPOR approach at the local level, explore potential
contributions of PPOR to MCH practice, and provide information on tools
developed to facilitate implementation of PPOR in the field.
Accompanying articles detail PPOR analytic methods and provide examples
of their use and local impact.
More information is available from the following MCH Library resource:
- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
************************************************************
5. STUDY EXAMINES USE OF INFANT CAR SEATS OUTSIDE THE CAR
"Car seats can lead to serious injuries and death if they are not used
properly or for their intended purpose," state the authors of an
article published in Pediatrics online (ahead of print) on July 5,
2010. The article provides estimates of the number and pattern of
injuries sustained from the hazardous use of car seats outside the car
in the United States from 2003 to 2007.
Data for the study were drawn from the National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System, a database through which the Consumer Product
Safety Commission records consumer-product-related injuries treated in
a nationally representative sample of emergency departments (EDs)
throughout the United States. The researchers extracted data detailing
injuries related to car seats among infants under age 12 months.
(Injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes and injuries from infant
carriers, bouncy chairs, or other related products were excluded.) The
parameters included were age, gender, race, location at which the
injury occurred, body part injured, injury diagnosis, and injury
disposition.
The authors found that
- There were an estimated 43,562 car-seat-related injuries treated
in hospital EDs in the United States during the 5-year period, with an
annual estimate of 8,712 injuries.
- The average age of the infants was 4.07 months plus or minus 2.73
months.
- Eighty-five percent of the injuries were related to falls. Of these, 64.8 percent were caused by infants falling out of car seats that were carried or placed on an elevated surface; 14.6 percent of the injuries were caused by car seats falling from elevated surfaces; and 5.6 percent were caused by falls, not specified.
- Head and neck injuries constituted the majority of injuries for
the sample.
The authors conclude with a discussion of the American Academy of
Pediatrics' guidelines for counseling and educating parents on injuries
to children, such as the duration of time the infant is seated in a car
seat and positioning outside the vehicle. The role of the media and
manufacturers in preventing injuries from the hazardous use of car
seats is also discussed.
Parikh SN, Wilson L. 2010. Hazardous use of car seats outside the car
in the United States, 2003-2007. Pediatrics [published online ahead of
print on July 5, 2010]. Abstract available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/peds.2010-0333v1
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Child Safety and Injury Prevention: Resource Brief at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/guides/childsafety.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2010 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health at Georgetown University under its
cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR: Jolene Bertness, M.Ed.
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez, M.S.L.S.
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel, M.A.
WRITER: Beth DeFrancis, M.L.S.
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************