
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
July 2, 2010
1. Guide Shares Strategies for Writing and Designing
Health Web Sites
2. Report Provides Parent Perspectives on the Ideal
Health Care Site for Adolescents
3. Article Identifies Risk and Protective Factors
Associated with Weapon-Carrying Among Urban American-Indian Adolescents
4. Study Examines Disparities in Children's Exposure to
Environmental Tobacco Smoke
5. Authors Outline Approaches to Meeting Oral Health Care
Needs in Rural Areas
************************************************************
1. GUIDE SHARES STRATEGIES FOR WRITING AND DESIGNING HEALTH WEB SITES
Health Literacy Online: A Guide to Writing and Designing Easy-to-Use
Health Web Sites is designed to help public health communication
professionals create Web sites and Web content for individuals with
limited literacy skills and limited experience using the Web. The
guide, written by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services'
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, contains strategies,
actions, testing methods, and resources to improve the online
experience for all users. Topics include delivering online health
information that is actionable and engaging, creating a health Web site
that is easy to use, and evaluating and improving a health Web site
with user-centered design. The guide is available at http://www.health.gov/healthliteracyonline
************************************************************
2. REPORT PROVIDES PARENT PERSPECTIVES ON THE IDEAL HEALTH CARE SITE
FOR ADOLESCENTS
Parents' Perspectives on Health Care for Adolescents presents findings
on adolescent health care based on a focus group study with parents of
adolescents (ages 14-21) in households with low incomes. The report,
published by the National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health with
support from the HSC Foundation, is based on seven ethnically diverse
focus groups of mixed gender, comprising 8-10 participants each (n=61),
held in July through August 2008 in Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, and
Washington, DC. Topics include concerns about adolescent health
problems, experiences obtaining care for adolescents, parental
responsibilities for ensuring care, boundaries of parental involvement,
and parents' desire for support. Content includes suggestions for the
"ideal health care experience," including the provision of staff and
services at a health care site and how to bring adolescents in and keep
them coming back. A comparison of parent and adolescent perspectives
and a description of the study methodology are also provided. The
report is available at http://www.thenationalalliance.org/mar10/Parents_Perspectives%20on_Health_Care%20_for%20Adolescents.pdf
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE IDENTIFIES RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH
WEAPON-CARRYING AMONG URBAN AMERICAN-INDIAN ADOLESCENTS
"Our results emphasize that those who are more likely to carry a weapon
also are more apt to use substances. They also show, however, that
school connectedness and peer prosocial norms can buffer against this
behavior," write the authors of an article published in the July 2010
issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health. Violence, manifested as
intentional injuries, continues to be one of the nation's most urgent
health problems of young people. Although a plethora of information
focuses on adolescent weapon-carrying and violence involvement in the
general population, data on urban American-Indian adolescents are
lacking. High levels of violence among American-Indian adolescents have
received growing attention; however, most extant research has been
conducted on reservations; little is known about those living in urban
areas. The study described in this article explored the most
significant risk and protective factors correlated with weapon-carrying
and determined the likelihood of weapon-carrying given various
combinations of risk and protective factors.
Participants (N=577) ranging in age from 9 to 15 completed the Urban
Indian Youth Health Survey (UIYHS), with a usable sample of 569. Along
with social, contextual, and demographic information, the UIYHS
assessed
an array of health-compromising behaviors and assets, strengths, or
protective factors.
The authors found that
- Among participants, 21.5 percent reported carrying a weapon in
the past month; of these, 35.2 percent carried a gun or a gun with
another weapon. Weapon-carrying increased with age, from 8.9 percent at
age 9 to 38.3 percent at age 15, and more males (57.6 percent) than
females carried a weapon.
- One risk factor (substance use) and two protective factors
(school connectedness and peer prosocial behavior norms) were
significantly associated with weapon-carrying.
- Among adolescents with the two protective factors and no risk
factor, 4 percent would be expected to carry a weapon.
- The likelihood of carrying a weapon increased almost six-fold (to
25 percent) as the risk factor was added to the model with the two
protective factors still in the model.
- With no risk factor in the profile, a reduction in protective
factors raised the probability of weapon-carrying from 4 percent to 31
percent. Likewise, for adolescents with fewer protective factors and
the risk factor, probabilities of weapon-carrying increased from 25
percent to 80 percent.
- For adolescents with no protective factors and no risk factor,
the probability of weapon-carrying was 31 percent -- almost eight times
the percentage for those with two protective factors and no risk factor
(4 percent).
The authors conclude that "greater effort can be given to sending
messages about the negative effect of using substances and the damaging
consequences of irresponsible use of firearms." They continue,
"however, equally important, connections to school need to be promoted,
and youth need to be directed to peer groups that advocate prosocial
behavior."
Bearinger LH, Pettingell SL, Resnick MC, et al. 2010. Reducing
weapon-carrying among urban American Indian young people. Journal of
Adolescent Health 47(1):43-50. Available at http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2810%2900019-4/abstract
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Adolescent Violence Prevention: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_adolvio.html
************************************************************
4. STUDY EXAMINES DISPARITIES IN CHILDREN'S EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL
TOBACCO SMOKE
"Marked racial-ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in
exposure to secondhand smoke shown here are likely to exacerbate health
inequalities among children," according to the authors of an article
published in the July 2010 issue of Pediatrics. Given the harmful
health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure among
children, it is important to know which states or demographic groups
have relatively high rates of exposure. Such information is vital to
the design and implementation of effective national and state tobacco
control programs aimed at curbing smoking rates in general and reducing
children's exposure to secondhand smoke in particular. The article
examines the extent to which children's exposure to tobacco smoke
inside the home varied across the 50 states and the District of
Columbia and among various racial-ethnic and sociodemographic groups.
Data for the study came from the 2007 National Survey of Children's
Health. Exposure to ETS or secondhand smoke was determined based on the
following questions asked of parents: "Does anyone in your household
use cigarettes, cigars, or pipe tobacco?" and "Does anyone smoke inside
the child's home?" Analysis was conducted for 90,853 children ages 18
and under for whom this information was available. Besides state of
residence, the researchers considered the following variables as
covariates: child's age, gender, race-ethnicity, household composition,
metropolitan-nonmetropolitan residence, primary language spoken at
home, and household poverty status. State-level data on home smoking
bans for adults ages 18 and older were derived from the 2006-2007
Current Population Survey-Tobacco Use Supplement to supplement analyses
of the NSCH data. The percentage of adults with the response "no one is
allowed to smoke anywhere inside the home" represented the rate of home
smoking bans. The analyses examined (1) the percentage of children who
were exposed to secondhand smoke for all 50 states and the District of
Columbia; (2) the association between each covariate, including state
of residence, and exposure; (3) the difference in prevalence between
any two states or sociodemographic groups; and (4) the odds and
adjusted prevalence of exposure for each state in 2007 after
controlling for selected sociodemographic factors.
The authors found that
- In 2007, 7.6 percent of U.S. children lived in households where
someone smoked inside the home. This prevalence varied from a low of
1.1 percent for Utah to a high of 17.9 percent for West Virginia.
- Adjustment for socioeconomic factors reduced geographic
disparities. Specifically, children in Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
and West Virginia had 12 times higher odds of being exposed to
secondhand smoke than children in Utah, and those in Delaware, the
District of Columbia, Missouri, and Wisconsin had 10 times higher odds.
After adjusting for state of residence and socioeconomic factors, the
authors found that
- Non-Hispanic white, black, American-Indian, and mixed-race
children had 2.0 to 2.6 times higher odds of being exposed to
secondhand smoke at home than Hispanic children.
- Children from families with incomes below the federal poverty
level (FPL) had 7.3 times higher adjusted odds of being exposed to
secondhand smoke at home than children from families with incomes at
400 percent of the FPL or greater.
- Children whose parents had less than 12 years of education had
10.6 times higher adjusted odds of being exposed than children whose
parents had college degrees.
- Children from English-speaking households had 4.1 times higher
odds of being exposed than children from non-English-speaking
households.
"The revised national target for reducing the childhood exposure to
tobacco smoke at home has been set at 6 percent for the year 2010,"
state the authors. To meet this objective, they conclude, "considerable
effort is needed at the national and state levels to reduce exposure
among children in a number of racial-ethnic and socioeconomic groups as
well as in the majority of states."
Singh GK, Siahpush M, Kogan MD. 2010. Disparities in children's
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007.
Pediatrics 126(1):4-13. Abstract available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/126/1/4
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Smoking and Tobacco Use Prevention: Bibliography of Materials from
MCHLine at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_smokingprev
************************************************************
5. AUTHORS OUTLINE APPROACHES TO MEETING ORAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS IN
RURAL AREAS
"Rural oral health disparities will be addressed effectively only when
innovative solutions that address the wide range of rural challenges
are implemented," state the authors of an article published in the June
2010 special issue of the Journal of Public Health Dentistry. The
article identifies challenges to improving the oral health of rural
populations and describes work force and service delivery solutions for
oral health in rural America. Descriptions of oral-health-improvement
programs are provided, accompanied by specific examples in rural areas.
The authors found that
- While there is variability across regions, characteristics of
rural oral health delivery systems include limited access to preventive
public health services, fewer oral health professionals (generalists as
well as specialists) per population than in urban areas, larger
proportions of the population without insurance or adequate income to
access oral health services, and more time and resources required to
bridge the geographic distances between populations and needed services.
Given the diversity of rural communities, improving their oral health
requires approaches to better distribute the rural oral health work
force and expand access to oral health services, including strategies
tailored to remote areas. Work force and service delivery solutions
being implemented and tested across a range of rural and underserved
communities are as follows:
- Involving mass prevention or public health interventions such as
increasing water fluoridation and providing oral health education,
caries risk assessment and referral, and preventive services.
- Offering behavioral health services for adults.
- Training more health professionals prepared to work in rural
areas. Examples include recruiting students from rural areas, creating
education partnerships in rural locations, and providing loan repayment
and scholarships.
- Increasing the flexibility and capacity of the oral health work
force by promoting new roles for existing health professionals
(permitting greater dental hygienist autonomy, involving medical
professionals in oral health care) and creating new types of health
professionals (dental health aid therapists, dental therapists).
- Overcoming distance barriers by providing mobile clinics and
offering telehealth for diagnosis, consultation, and continuing
education.
"Limited and sporadic efforts, such as relying on dentist volunteerism
to overcome access barriers in underserved areas, are not substitutes
for systematic approaches to oral health care," state the authors. They
conclude that "prevention needs to be at the front line of rural oral
health care, with systematic approaches that cross health professions
and health sectors."
Skillman SM, Doescher MP, Mouradian WE, et al. 2010. The challenge to
delivering oral health services in rural America. Journal of Public
Health Dentistry 70(s1):S49-S57. Abstract available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123557157/abstract
Readers: The June 2010 special of issue of the Journal of Public Health
Dentistry focuses on efforts to improve oral health care delivery
systems through work force innovations. The special issue is available
at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118502703/home
More information is available from the following MCH Library resource:
- Oral Health for, Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women:
Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_oralhealth.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2010 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR: Jolene Bertness, M.Ed.
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez, M.S.L.S.
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel, M.A.
WRITER: Beth DeFrancis, M.L.S.
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************