
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
June 4, 2010
1. Plan Identifies National Goals and Strategies for
Creating a Health-Literate Society
2. Study Looks at School Nurses' Perceptions of the Role
of Schools in Helping Students Obtain Public Health Insurance
3. Analysis Describes Rates of Paternal Prenatal and
Postpartum Depression over Time and Its Association with Maternal
Depression
4. Authors Examine Co-Occurrence of Five Subtypes of Peer
Victimization
************************************************************
1. PLAN IDENTIFIES NATIONAL GOALS AND STRATEGIES FOR CREATING A
HEALTH-LITERATE SOCIETY
National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy seeks to engage
organizations, professionals, policymakers, communities, and families
in a linked, multisector effort to improve health literacy. The plan
was prepared under the leadership of the Health Literacy Workgroup and
produced by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Based on the 2006 Surgeon
General's Workshop on Improving Health Literacy, a series of town hall
meetings in 2007 and 2008, and feedback from stakeholder organizations
in 2009, the plan is the result of work by public- and private-sector
organizations and individuals to draw attention to health literacy as a
major public health issue. Content includes goals and strategies to
support, and help achieve, Healthy People objectives in health literacy
and related areas. Many of the strategies highlight actions that
particular organizations or professions can take to further the goals.
The plan also suggests action steps for individuals and families to
take on their own or in collaboration with groups in their communities.
The plan is available at http://www.health.gov/communication/HLActionPlan/pdf/Health_Literacy_Action_Plan.pdf
************************************************************
2. STUDY LOOKS AT SCHOOL NURSES' PERCEPTIONS OF THE ROLE OF SCHOOLS IN
HELPING STUDENTS OBTAIN PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE
"School nurses who indicated they helped parents enroll their children
in public health insurance programs perceived a greater number of
benefits and fewer barriers toward getting the process completed,"
state the authors of an article published in the June 2010 issue of the
Journal of School Health. There is limited research on the role schools
play in assisting students in obtaining public health insurance. The
article presents findings from a study to assess public school nurses'
knowledge and beliefs of the impact of health insurance on children and
adolescents and to determine whether they or their schools were
involved in helping students obtain public health insurance (Medicaid
and the Children's Health Insurance Program [CHIP]) and, if they were,
what practices they used. In addition, the study examined school
nurses' perceived benefits of and perceived barriers to helping
students obtain public health insurance. Finally, the authors assess
what factors could explain whether schools are helping students obtain
public health insurance.
The researchers developed and mailed a four-page, 30-item,
closed-format questionnaire to 750 public school nurses working in the
United States, randomly selected from the membership of the National
Association of School Nurses. The questionnaire assessed the nurses'
perceptions and practices of schools assisting students in obtaining
public health insurance as well as the participants' backgrounds and
demographic characteristics. Six statements were provided, from which
respondents could select one statement to identify their school's stage
under the Stages of Change theory with respect to obtaining public
health insurance.
The authors found that
- A total of 417 public school nurses (56 percent) responded to the
questionnaire.
- Approximately one-third (34 percent) of public school nurses
indicated that their schools expected them to help parents enroll their
children in public health insurance programs.
- The perceived benefits identified by 90 percent of school nurses
were as follows: keep students healthier (95 percent), reduce the
number of students with untreated health problems (95 percent), and
reduce school absenteeism (90 percent). The primary barriers were not
having enough staff (64 percent) and not having enough time (55
percent).
- Most respondents thought schools should provide parents with
access to state-funded health insurance enrollment forms (92 percent),
but fewer thought schools should help parents fill out state-funded
health insurance enrollment forms (53 percent).
- The majority (58 percent) of school nurses indicated that they
personally helped students obtain state-funded health insurance. Only 7
percent reported that their school had received financial support to
help students enroll in state-funded health insurance.
"Perceived barriers . . . should be addressed by school systems and
CHIP to facilitate school nurses' ability to play a role in getting
uninsured children enrolled in public health insurance," conclude the
authors.
Rickard ML, Hendershot C, Khubchandani J, et al. 2010. School nurses’
perceptions and practices of assisting students in obtaining public
health insurance. Journal of School Health 80(6):312-320. Abstract
available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123439475/abstract
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Health Insurance and Access to Care for Children and Adolescents:
Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_insurance.html
- School Health: Resource Brief at
http://mchlibrary.info/guides/schoolhealth.html
************************************************************
3. ANALYSIS DESCRIBES RATES OF PATERNAL PRENATAL AND POSTPARTUM
DEPRESSION OVER TIME AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH MATERNAL DEPRESSION
"The overall meta-analytic rate of paternal depression between the
first trimester and 1 year postpartum . . . suggests that paternal
prenatal and postpartum depression represents a significant public
health concern," state the authors of an article published in the May
19, 2010, issue of JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical
Association. The prevalence, risk factors, and effects of depression
among new fathers are poorly understood. The article presents findings
from a meta-analysis of depression in expecting and new fathers to (1)
estimate paternal depression between the first trimester and 1 year
postpartum; (2) describe differences across the time period; (3)
examine the association between paternal and maternal depression; (4)
estimate the prevalence of maternal prenatal and postpartum depression
identified in paternal depression studies; and (5) identify how
published rates of paternal depression were affected by methodological
factors such as measurement method, study location, and sample risk
status.
Studies for the meta-analysis were drawn from relevant reviews; a
search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Dissertation Abstracts International,
EMBASE, and Google Scholar; and reference lists of retrieved articles.
The initial analysis included all journal articles, dissertations, and
book chapters produced between January 1980 and October 2009 that
assessed paternal depression during pregnancy, the first postpartum
year, or both. Studies that reported an estimated number of cases among
identified fathers were selected for further analyses. The primary
outcome was the point prevalence rate of paternal depression. Secondary
outcomes included rates of depression in female partners and
correlations between paternal and maternal depressive symptoms. The
research also examined the following determinants of primary and
secondary outcomes: period of measurement, risk status of the sample,
and case identification method (interview vs. rating scale). Study
location was also coded.
The authors found that
- The overall rate of paternal depression between the first
trimester and 1 year postpartum was 10.4 percent (compared with recent
national data on base rates of depression in men at 4.8 percent).
- There was considerable variability between different time
periods, with the 3- to 6-month postpartum period showing the highest
rate of paternal depression and the first 3 postpartum months showing
the lowest rate.
- U.S. studies reported an average rate of paternal depression at
14.1 percent, and international studies reported an average rate of 8.2
percent.
- Interview-based case definition methods were associated with
lower overall prevalence estimates.
- The overall estimate of maternal-paternal depressive symptom
correlation was significant.
"The observation that expecting and new fathers disproportionately
experience depression suggests that more efforts should be made to
improve screening and referral," conclude the authors. The correlation
between paternal and maternal depression also suggests . . . that
prevention and intervention efforts for depression in parents might be
focused on the couple and family rather than the individual," they add.
Paulson JF, Bazemore SD. 2010. Prenatal and postpartum depression in
fathers and its association with maternal depression: A meta-analysis.
JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
303(19):1961-1969. Abstract available at http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/303/19/1961
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Depression During and After Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_postpartum.html
- Fatherhood: Resource Brief at
http://mchlibrary.info/guides/fatherhood.html
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS EXAMINE CO-OCCURRENCE OF FIVE SUBTYPES OF PEER VICTIMIZATION
"Different types of bullying victimization appear to co-occur among US
adolescents," state the authors of an article published in the Journal
of Pediatric Psychology online (ahead of print) on May 20, 2010.
Empirical evidence suggests that different types of victimization are
highly correlated and that the same individuals may be victimized in
multiple ways. However, most of the studies analyzing the association
between traditional and cyber victimization quantify traditional
victimization using a global measure. It remains unclear how cyber
victimization and specific types of traditional victimization are
associated and might co-occur in the same person. The study described
in the article examined cyber victimization and most common types of
traditional victimization in a nationally representative sample.
Data were obtained from the 2005-2006 Health Behavior in School-Aged
Children study conducted in the United States. Data were collected
through anonymous self-report questionnaires distributed in the
classroom. The first purpose of the study was to examine the
co-occurrence of victimization from four main types of traditional
bullying (physical, verbal, social exclusion, and spreading rumors) and
from cyber bullying through a series of latent class analysis (LCA)
models. The participants (n=7,475 adolescents) were asked how often
they were bullied in the past couple of months and, based on their
observed responses, they were classified into three ordered latent
classes. The present study also explored demographic characteristics
(grade, gender, and race-ethnicity) and compared physical and
psychological outcomes (depression, medically attended injuries, and
medicine use for sleeplessness and nervousness) across the latent
classes.
The following three classes were extracted:
- Class 1: All-types victims -- individuals with a high probability
of being victimized by the four traditional bullying behaviors and a
moderately high probability of being victimized by cyber bullying --
9.7 percent of males and 6.2 percent of females.
- Class 2: Verbal-relational victims -- individuals with a
moderately high probability of verbal, social exclusion, and
rumor-spreading types of victimization and relatively low probability
of physical and cyber victimization -- 28.1 percent of males and 35.1
percent of females.
- Class 3: Non-victims -- individuals with a minimal probability of
being victimized by any bullying behavior -- 62.2 percent male, 58.7
percent female.
The authors also found that
- Compared to females, males were more likely to be all-types
victims.
- In general, the all-types victims reported higher depression,
more injuries, and more medicine use for sleeplessness and nervousness
than the verbal-relational victims, followed by the nonvictims.
"Intervention efforts should address various symptoms among victims of
bullying and especially those who suffer from multiple types of
victimization," conclude the authors.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Luk JW, et al. 2010. Co-occurrence of
victimization from five subtypes of bullying: Physical, verbal, social
exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. Journal of Pediatric Psychology
[published online ahead of print on May 20, 2010]. Abstract available http://jpepsy.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/jsq048
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Adolescent Violence Prevention: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_adolvio.html
- Bullying: Bibliography of Materials from MCHLine at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_bullying
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2010 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR: Jolene Bertness, M.Ed.
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez, M.S.L.S.
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel, M.A.
WRITER: Beth DeFrancis, M.L.S.
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************