
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
and Unexpected Infant/Child and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at
Georgetown University. This
and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
October 30, 2009
1. National Center Compiles Resources on Child Care and
SIDS
2. Guide Provides Tips on Infant Safety for Parents and
Other Caregivers
3. Study Identifies Promising Data Elements for
Environmental Public Health Tracking of Reproductive Outcomes
4. Authors Examine Opportunities and Limitations in Using
Death Certificates to Characterize SIDS
5. Article Evaluates the Relationships Between Infant
Mortality and Place, Poverty, and Race in the Lower Mississippi Delta
************************************************************
1. NATIONAL CENTER COMPILES RESOURCES ON CHILD CARE AND SIDS
Child Care and SIDS contains a selection of resources for families and
professionals on child care and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
The resource, produced by the National Sudden and Unexpected
Infant/Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at Georgetown
University, lists brochures, fact sheets, model policies, training
courses, campaigns, self-learning modules, curricula, licensing
regulations, legislation, and standards available from national
organizations and state programs. Several of the listed resources are
available in Spanish. Topics include infant sleep position, tummy time,
foster care, emergency procedures, and bereavement support. The
resource is available at http://sidscenter.org/childcare.html.
************************************************************
2. GUIDE PROVIDES TIPS ON INFANT SAFETY FOR PARENTS AND OTHER CAREGIVERS
Baby Safety Basics: A Guide to Keeping Your Baby Safe During the First
Year of Life provides information on infant safety for new and
expecting parents and other caregivers. The guide, published by Safe
Kids USA and Cribs for Kids, addresses infant safety during sleep;
while feeding, bathing, or playing; and when riding in the car. Content
includes tips on buying a crib, do's and don'ts of safe sleep,
recommended toys and toys to avoid, preventing poisonings and falls,
and installing a car seat. Additional information on infant product
safety and ways to make the home safer is presented. The guide is
available at http://sk.convio.net/site/DocServer/Baby_Safety_Guide.pdf?docID=24661.
************************************************************
3. STUDY IDENTIFIES PROMISING DATA ELEMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC
HEALTH TRACKING OF REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES
"The addition of data elements (e.g., length of maternal residence) to
birth and fetal death certificates may be a useful and cost-effective
means of enhancing the ability of state health departments to track
adverse reproductive outcomes and assess associations with
environmental risk factors, if their accuracy and completeness can be
demonstrated and they are shown to reduce misclassification of
exposure," state the authors of an article published in the
November-December 2009 issue of Public Health Reports. Environmental
public health tracking (EPHT) is the ongoing collection, integration,
analysis, and dissemination of data from environmental-hazard
monitoring, human-exposure tracking, and health-effect surveillance.
The current EPHT surveillance system depends on birth, fetal death, and
death certificates and other health data routinely collected and made
available by health departments, registries, and other institutions.
The content, format, and standardization of birth and fetal death
certificates as well as other vital records are reviewed periodically
to help promote a consistent, reliable, and usable source of
information nationwide. The focus has been on sociodemographic risk
factors and medical and pregnancy histories, but not on items that may
be of environmental significance. The article describes a study to
inventory and review existing data elements on the birth and fetal
death certificates of all 50 U.S. states to identify nonstandard data
items that are environmentally relevant, are inexpensive to collect,
and might enhance EPHT analyses.
The researchers obtained records from the 50 states and summarized the
results in a matrix containing data elements by state. Then, they
determined whether each element was synonymous with an element on the
current (2003) National Center for Health Statistics' standard for
birth and fetal death certificates, different from standard elements
but providing similar information, or not included on the standard
birth and fetal death certificate.
The authors found that
- Every state included mother's city or town of residence at
delivery on the birth certificate, and 46 states also included street
address. How long the mother has lived at her current residence or in
her present town at time of birth was not a data element on the
standard birth certificate but was included on the certificates of
Connecticut, Maine, Missouri, and Washington. Using such information
would help reduce the misclassification of exposure that may occur when
only maternal address at birth is available and could assist in
measuring duration of exposure to environmental contaminants.
- Father's residence was not a data element on the standard birth
certificate but was included on the certificates of New York and South
Dakota. It was also listed in the paternity acknowledgement section of
the certificates of Florida, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey,
and Texas. (Vermont included father's mailing address only; mailing
address is not the same as residence.) Father's residential location
could be useful in determining paternal environmental exposures in
cases in which the parents do not live together.
- Although parental occupation was not included on the 2003
standard birth certificate, it was listed on the certificates of 16
states.
- In general, the results for fetal death certificates were similar
to those for birth certificates.
"If these data elements can be reported completely and accurately, then
their addition to birth and fetal death certificates and other health
records may be a valuable and cost-effective method for state health
departments to improve their capacity to conduct EPHT," conclude the
authors.
Fitzgerald E, Wartenberg D, Thompson WD, et al. 2009. Birth and fetal
death records and environmental exposures: Promising data elements for
environmental public health tracking of reproductive outcomes. Public
Health Reports 124(6):825-830. Available to subscribers at http://www.publichealthreports.org/userfiles/124_6/825-830.pdf.
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS EXAMINE OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN USING DEATH
CERTIFICATES TO CHARACTERIZE SIDS
"Most SIDS [sudden infant death syndrome]-coded deaths (approximately
80 percent) lacked additional information about contributory or
possible causal factors, and thus we could not quantify and describe
SIDS deaths that may have been affected by modifiable risk factors such
as prone sleeping, soft bedding in the sleep environment, and
bed-sharing," state the authors of an article published in the Journal
of Pediatrics online (ahead of print) on September 26, 2009. A broad
range of terms result in a death being assigned the International
Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code of R95 for
SIDS. Lack of clarity and reliability are well-documented issues
affecting the ability to monitor and understand SIDS trends and, more
important, to identify potentially modifiable risk factors associated
with these deaths. Beginning in 2003, the National Center for Health
Statistics (NCHS) electronically captured all text reported by
certifiers in the cause-of-death section of all U.S. death
certificates. The article presents findings from a study to examine the
actual cause-of-death terminology written on SIDS death certificates
and determine the adequacy of these text data to describe more fully
the circumstances that may contribute to SIDS.
Data for the analysis was drawn from the 2003 and 2004 NCHS mortality
files. The study included all deaths assigned the ICD-10 underlying
cause-of-death code for SIDS. For each death, the researchers examined
several lines of text from the death certificate's cause-of-death
section. Next, they grouped together deaths described with the same
terminology, and on the basis of these groupings, divided the
SIDS-coded deaths into SIDS-related cause-of-death subcategories. The
analysis also grouped records that contained terms related to
contributory factors or potential causes of death. Such factors
included terms indicating co-morbidities, risk factors, and
environmental stressors.
The authors found that
- In 2003 and 2004, records of 4,408 infant deaths had a SIDS-coded
underlying cause of death, and all these records except 20 included
some text data that was informative and could be assessed. Most of
these deaths were subcategorized as "SIDS" (67.3 percent) and "SUID"
(11.0 percent).
- Most records (79.4 percent) did not mention additional terms
describing contributory or possible causal factors.
- Twelve records subcategorized as "miscellaneous" contained terms
such as "not SIDS," "suffocation," or "drug intoxication."
- Although most death certificates (88.3 percent) indicated that an
autopsy had been performed, only 65.3 percent indicated that autopsy
findings were available before certification.
- In the evaluation of manner of death, natural manner was reported
on 84.6 percent of certificates subcategorized as "SIDS," but on only
32.5 percent of certificates were subcategorized as "other than "SIDS."
- Of the death certificates that included a description of
contributory or potentially causal factors, "bedsharing or unsafe sleep
environment" was mentioned on at least 80 percent of certificates
categorized as "consistent with SIDS," "SUID," or "unknown."
Co-morbidities was the next most commonly mentioned factor on
certificates for SIDS-related deaths.
"We need to better understand the variations in terminology, why
different terms are used, and how they might be best classified
according to the ICD. Such information could be used to inform future
revisions to the ICD, resulting in a more accurate and informative
estimate of the burden of SIDS and other causes of sudden, unexpected
infant death," the authors conclude.
Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Kim SY, Chu SY, et al. 2009. Using death
certificates to characterize sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS):
Opportunities and limitations. Journal of Pediatrics [published online
ahead of print on September 26, 2009]. Available at http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(09)00650-7/abstract.
************************************************************
5. ARTICLE EVALUATES THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INFANT MORTALITY AND
PLACE, POVERTY, AND RACE IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI DELTA
"Place, poverty and race are all important factors to consider when
evaluating disparities in infant mortality rates," writes the author of
an article published in the November 2009 issue of the Maternal and
Child Health Journal. One of the major goals of the Healthy People 2010
initiative is to eliminate health disparities in the United States. The
creators of this goal define six types of disparities that persist
across a range of health outcomes: gender, race or ethnicity, education
or income, disability, geographic location, and sexual orientation. The
impoverished counties of the Mississippi Delta have experienced
chronically higher incidence and prevalence of many types of morbidity
and disease-specific mortality than the nation as a whole. The
objectives of this study were to explore regional, economic, and racial
disparities in infant mortality rates between geographic subregions
within the eight states comprising the Delta and to examine the impact
of county-level poverty and racial composition on these regional
disparities over time.
The study used secondary data analysis and had both cross-sectional and
longitudinal components. Models testing the impact of subregional
geographic differences, percentage of poverty, percentage of black
population, and interaction effects were conducted at three time
periods, the late 1970s, late 1980s, and late 1990s.
The authors found that
- Among blacks, infant mortality rates were similar in all four
regions (Central Delta counties, fringe Delta counties, non-Delta
counties, and Alabama fringe Delta counties) and in the country as a
whole in all time periods; there was no detectable pattern in regional
differences.
- White rates were somewhat higher in Alabama and Central Delta
counties, compared with the other two regions, in the first and second
time periods.
- White rates were higher than the national mean in all regions in
all three time periods.
- In all regions, as well as in the nation as a whole, white rates
decreased more than black rates.
- During the first time period, all three independent variables
(region, poverty, and race) were significant predictors of higher
incidences of infant mortality.
- During the second two time periods, regional differences were not
significant when percentage of individual poverty and percentage of
black population were added to the model. However, both percentage of
individual poverty and percentage of black population were significant
predictors of infant mortality rates during the second time period.
The authors conclude that "analyses such as this one . . . could assist
in maternal and child health policy and program development and help us
to better focus our limited resources."
Eudy RL. 2009. Infant mortality in the Lower Mississippi Delta:
Geography, poverty and race. Maternal and Child Health Journal
13(6):806-813. Abstract available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/u465316h76352577.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_race.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y, via RSS Feed at http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/21403022.rss,
and on Facebook at http://bit.ly/5hQew
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health at Georgetown University under its
cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************