
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
October 9, 2009
************************************************************
Special Notice: The 15th Annual Maternal and Child Health
Epidemiology Conference invites maternal and child health (MCH)
professionals to share experiences, enhance knowledge, and generate new
ideas for improved MCH data use and informed policymaking. The
conference will be held on December 9-11, 2009, in Tampa, Florida, and
will feature keynote speaker, David Barker, M.D., Ph.D., F.R.S.,
pioneer of the fetal origins hypothesis. The annual national scientific
conference is sponsored by the Maternal and Child Health Epidemiology
Program, a collaborative effort between the Health Resources and
Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Reproductive
Health. More information is available at http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/MCHEpi/2009/AboutConference.htm.
************************************************************
1. Resource Serves Children's Health Community in
Integrating Information Technology into Promoting Child Health and
Well-Being
2. Article Examines Forms of Bullying Behaviors Among
U.S. Adolescents
3. Authors Evaluate Effectiveness of
Teacher Questionnaire in Identifying Learning Problems in Children
Evaluated for ADHD
4. Study Provides Clinicians and Parents with Traumatic
Brain Injury Risk Data for Informed Decision Making
************************************************************
1. RESOURCE SERVES CHILDREN'S HEALTH COMMUNITY IN INTEGRATING
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTO PROMOTING CHILD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
Health IT for Children Toolbox provides resources for a diverse group
of stakeholders to support information technology (IT) in children's
health promotion and disease prevention. The toolbox was developed by
the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in conjunction
with Nemours Health and Prevention Services, the California HealthCare
Foundation, and the California Endowment as a resource for those who
are seeking knowledge about how health IT can be used to promote
children's health and well-being. Three of seven toolbox modules are
currently available. Contents include a general introduction to the
heath IT landscape and a specific view of health IT for children within
that landscape, an overview of federal and state initiatives on health
IT for children, resources for those interested in learning about and
implementing cross-sector coordination and data sharing-initiatives,
and resources for those interested in learning about enhancing
collaboration and the use of health IT to ensure that eligible children
are enrolled in public health insurance programs. Relevant resources
from other HRSA toolboxes, such as the Health IT Adoption Toolbox, are
also incorporated. The toolbox is available at http://www.hrsa.gov/healthit.
Readers: More information is available from the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality National Resource Center for health IT at http://healthit.ahrq.gov.
************************************************************
2. ARTICLE EXAMINES FORMS OF BULLYING BEHAVIORS AMONG U.S. ADOLESCENTS
Our results suggest that "positive parental behaviors protect
adolescents from not only bullying others but also being bullied . . .
[and] that friendship protects adolescents from being selected as
targets of bullies," state the authors of an article published in the
October 2009 issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health. Previous
research indicates that parents and friends are two important sources
of social influences associated with adolescent bullying and
victimization. However, no studies have examined the roles of parents
and friends across different forms of bullying, particularly cyber
bullying. In addition, few national studies have been conducted to
provide a valid estimation of prevalence of physical, verbal,
relational, and cyber bullying by adolescents' gender, age, and race
and ethnicity in the United States. The article presents findings from
a study to examine four forms of in-school bullying, with two main
purposes: (1) to explore gender, age, racial, and socioeconomic
differences in prevalence of each form of bullying among adolescents in
grades 6 through 10 and (2) to examine the roles of parental support
and number of friends on each form.
Self-report data on bullying were collected from 7,508 U.S. adolescents
in the 2005-2006 Health Behavior in School-Aged Children study, a World
Health Organization collaborative cross-national study examining health
behaviors among children and their social determinants. Descriptive
statistics were used to determine the prevalence of involvement in
bullying and being bullied, and the prevalence for each of four
bullying classifications (physical, verbal, relational, cyber).
Participants were coded as involved or not involved in each form of
bullying or victimization. They were then categorized into one of four
groups: involved in bullying others only (bullies), involved in being
bullied only (victims), involved in both bullying others and being
bullied (bully-victims), or not involved at all (noninvolved). The
analyses compared bullies, victims, and bully-victims with those who
were never involved, in relation to parental support, friend group
status, and sociodemographic variables. The study also determined
whether parental support and number of friends were associated with
each form of bullying differentially by gender.
The authors found that
- The prevalence of involvement in bullying others, being bullied,
or both (within the last 2 months) was 20.8 percent for physical, 53.6
percent for verbal, 51.4 percent for relational, and 13.6 percent for
cyber.
- Compared with girls, boys were more likely to be involved in
physical (bullies, victims, or bully-victims) and verbal forms
(bully-victims), but less likely to be involved in relational forms
(victims or bully-victims). For cyber bullying, boys were more likely
to be bullies, whereas girls were more likely to be victims.
- Compared with white adolescents, African-American adolescents
were more involved in bullying perpetration (physical, verbal, and
cyber), but less involved in victimization (verbal and relational).
- More parental support was negatively associated with involvement
in bullying across all four forms.
- Number of friends was related to involvement in all three
traditional forms (physical, verbal, relational) but was not related to
cyber bullying. For physical, verbal, and relational bullying,
adolescents with more friends were more likely to be bullies but less
likely to be victims, and, with the exception of physical bullying,
they were also less likely to be bully-victims.
"Our results confirmed the important roles of parental support and
number of friends, and suggest that demographic characteristic as well
as different forms of bullying should be considered when examining or
planning interventions on adolescent bullying," conclude the authors.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. 2009. School bullying among adolescents
in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal
of Adolescent Health 45(4):368-375. Abstract available at http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(09)00138-4/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Adolescent Violence Prevention: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_adolvio.html
- Bullying: Annotated Bibliography at
http://mchlibrary.info/databases/bibliography.php?target=auto_search_bullying
************************************************************
3. AUTHORS EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHER QUESTIONNAIRE IN
IDENTIFYING LEARNING PROBLEMS IN CHILDREN EVALUATED FOR ADHD
"The APQ [Academic Performance Questionnaire] may be a useful initial
screening tool for assessing learning problems among children who
present with symptoms of ADHD [attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder] or other school problems," write the authors of an article
published in the October 2009 issue of Pediatrics. ADHD is a
neurobehavioral disorder that appears early in childhood and is
characterized by inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity, resulting
in functional impairments. It has an estimated prevalence of 2 percent
to 10 percent among children and adolescents. When left untreated or
unrecognized, ADHD and its comorbidities have been associated with
strained familial and peer relationships, educational and employment
difficulties, substance use, and unintentional injuries. The APQ is a
questionnaire that is completed by teachers to identify a child's
performance in reading, math, writing, and homework. The measure has
been used to obtain descriptive information about children who are
being evaluated for ADHD. The purposes of the study described in this
article were to (1) examine the test-retest reliability of the APQ and
(2) evaluate the validity of the APQ with regard to predicting low
achievement in reading or math.
The study population consisted of 271 children in grades 1 through 6
who had been evaluated through a multidisciplinary ADHD center between
May 2001 and March 2005. Children who were already receiving assistance
with learning problems in special education were excluded from the
study. Children were randomly assigned to a score-development group
(n=215) and a validation group (n=56).
The authors found that
- Approximately 17 percent of the sample were determined to be low
achievers in reading, math, or both: math only, 9.5 percent; reading
only, 3.7 percent; and both reading and math, 3.3 percent.
- Two of the 10 APQ questions (one about reading and one about
math) were uniquely predictive of low achievement.
- Inclusion of additional APQ questions that showed a trend toward
being predictive of low achievement did not improve the area under the
curve or psychometric properties.
The authors conclude that "the APQ may function well as an initial
screener; for children who screen positive, it may be sensible to
administer an additional screener before a complete psychoeducational
assessment is performed."
Bennett AE, Power TJ, Eiraldi RB, et al. 2009. Identifying learning
problems in children evaluated for ADHD: The Academic Performance
Questionnaire. Pediatrics 124(4):633-639. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/124/4/e633.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Challenges in Children and
Adolescents: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_Mental_Conditions.html
************************************************************
4. STUDY PROVIDES CLINICIANS AND PARENTS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
RISK DATA FOR INFORMED DECISION MAKING
"We derived and validated prediction rules for ciTBIs [clinically
important traumatic brain injuries] in a large, diverse population of
children with minor head trauma," state the authors of an article
published in the October 3, 2009, issue of The Lancet. Traumatic brain
injury is a leading cause of death and disability in children
worldwide. CT scans (CTs) are the reference standard for rapid
detection of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). However, the risk of
ciTBIs after minor head trauma should be balanced against the risks of
ionizing radiation of CTs. Improved methods to assess head injuries in
children and evidence-based use of CTs are research priorities. The
article discusses results from a study to identify children at very low
risk for ciTBI after blunt head trauma for whom CTs might be
unnecessary.
The sample for this prospective cohort study included children ages 18
and under presenting within 24 hours of head trauma in 25 emergency
departments of a pediatric research network. Children were enrolled
from June 2004 to March 2006, and the validation population was
enrolled from March 2006 through September 2006. The study defined
ciTBI a priori as death from TBI, neurosurgery, intubation for more
than 24 hours for TBI, or hospital admission of 2 nights or more
associated with TBI on CTs. Preverbal (under age 2) and verbal (ages 2
and over) children were analyzed separately because of young children's
greater sensitivity to radiation, minimal ability to communicate, and
different mechanisms and risks for TBI. Injury mechanisms and clinical
variables were evaluated to derive prediction rules. Children were
considered to be at very low risk for ciTBI if none of the predictors
in the derived rules was present.
The authors found that
- Of the 42,412 children eligible for analysis, 10, 178 (25
percent) were under age 2.
- CTs were obtained on 14,969 (35.5 percent) of the children, of
whom 780 (5.2 percent) had TBIs on CT.
- Of 42,412 children, 376 had ciTBIs, with similar percentages in
both age groups and in derivation and validation populations. Of the
376 children with ciTBIs, 60 (15.9 percent) underwent neurosurgery, and
8 were intubated for more than 24 hours for TBI.
- In the validation group for children under age 2, the prediction
rule (normal mental status, no scalp hematoma except frontal, no loss
of consciousness for 5 seconds or more, non-severe injury mechanism, no
palpable skull fracture, and acting normally according to the parent)
had a negative predictive value of 100 percent and sensitivity of 100
percent.
- In the validation group for children ages 2 and older, the
prediction rule (normal mental status, no loss of consciousness, no
history of vomiting, non-severe injury mechanism, no clinical signs of
basilar skull fracture, and no severe headache) had a negative
predictive value of 99.95 percent and sensitivity of 96.8 percent.
"Application of these rules could limit CT use, protecting children
from unnecessary radiation risks," conclude the authors. They add,
"these rules provide the necessary data to assist clinicians and
families in CT decision making after head trauma."
Kupperman N, Holmes PS, Hoyle JD, et al. 2009. Identification of
children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after
head trauma: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet
374(9696):1160-1170. Abstract available at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)61558-0/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Child Safety and Injury Prevention: Resource Brief at
http://mchlibrary.info/guides/childsafety.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y, via RSS Feed at http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/21403022.rss,
and on Facebook at http://bit.ly/5hQew
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************