MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality


Maternal and Child Health Library

MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden and Unexpected Infant/Child and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at Georgetown University. This and past issues are available online at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.


July 31, 2009

************************************************************

Special Notice: Thanks to all who have completed our 2009 Reader Feedback Form. If you have not yet completed the form, please take a few moments to complete the questions and submit your comments. You will find the form online at

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=16ZJG5kXZgVQC_2bHc_2bxFH6A_3d_3d

************************************************************

1. Brief Features Home Visiting Resources
2. Promising Practice Series Focuses on Cultural and Linguistic Competence in Addressing Perinatal Death
3. Authors Characterize Delivery Indications for Late Preterm Births and Their Potential Impact on Neonatal and Infant Mortality Rates
4. Article Assesses Health Professionals' SIDS Knowledge and Willingness to Discuss SIDS with Parents
5. Study Incorporates Consumer Perspective into the Healthy Start Program Evaluation

************************************************************

1. BRIEF FEATURES HOME VISITING RESOURCES

Home Visiting: Resource Brief contains information about home visitation programs and the variety of family-focused services they offer to pregnant women and families with new infants and young children. The brief, produced by the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Library at Georgetown University, lists Web sites and related MCH Library resources. Sample resources include testimonies and legislative updates such as an overview of the home visitation component of the president's fiscal-year 2010 budget proposal. Additional resources include issue briefs, testimonies, and research findings; policy statements; state and local program guidelines and examples; professional- and consumer-education materials; documents on program development, core competencies, supervision, and evaluation; curricula and training; and Webinars. A guide for home visitors on educating parents and caregivers about infant safe sleep is also provided. The brief is available at http://mchlibrary.info/guides/homevisiting.html.

************************************************************

2. PROMISING PRACTICE SERIES FOCUSES ON CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE IN ADDRESSING PERINATAL DEATH

Organizational Policy Supports Families in Times of Crisis: Fredericksburg, VA highlights key values, policies, and practices of culturally and linguistically competent perinatal bereavement support. The brief is part of the Promising Practices series produced by the National Center for Cultural Competence at Georgetown University with support from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Topics include the challenge, strategy, action, and why it works. The brief examines the impact of demographic changes in the Fredericksburg, VA, area and outlines efforts to create a structure to oversee and promote cultural and linguistic competence throughout the area's health care system. The authors discuss the role of the coordinator of cultural services in supporting hospital staff to develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills to adapt the care they give to families and, specifically, to meet cultural preferences and needs following a perinatal death. The brief is available at http://www11.georgetown.edu/research/gucchd/nccc/documents/BEREAVE_virginiafinal.pdf.

************************************************************

3. AUTHORS CHARACTERIZE DELIVERY INDICATIONS FOR LATE PRETERM BIRTHS AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NEONATAL AND INFANT MORTALITY RATES

"We found that 1 in 5 late-preterm deliveries occurred with no recorded medical or obstetric indication," state the authors of an article published in the July 2009 issue of Pediatrics. The preterm birth rate has increased in the United States by 20 percent in 15 years, from 10.6 percent in 1990 to 12.7 percent in 2005. Infants born at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation now account for 71 percent of all preterm births. This subgroup, referred to as "late preterm," is growing at a faster rate than any other preterm birth subgroup. Compared with term infants, late-preterm infants manifest higher frequencies of neonatal and postneonatal morbidities, higher rates of rehospitalization after neonatal discharge, higher rates of neonatal and postneonatal mortality, and significantly higher rates of major disabilities. Thus, the increasing late-preterm birth rate should of great concern, because the societal burden is profound. However, comprehensive studies that address the reasons for the increasing rate of late-preterm births, which may potentially lead to reduction strategies, are lacking. The article presents findings from a study to determine why singleton late-preterm births are taking place and to compare the delivery implications with neonatal and infant mortality rates.

The study analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics 2001 birth cohort linked birth-death files of 3,483,496 singleton births at 34 to 41 weeks of gestation. Neonatal and infant mortality rates were calculated by week of gestation at birth and the indication for delivery. Week 39 had the lowest neonatal mortality rate and was, therefore, used as the reference week when comparing mortality by week of delivery. Late-preterm births were classified by delivery indications into the following five categories: (1) maternal medical conditions; (2) obstetric complications; (3) major congenital anomalies; (4) isolated spontaneous labor: vaginal delivery without induction and without associated medical-obstetric factors; and (5) no recorded indication: no documented indications. The analysis assessed the association between selected maternal demographic and medical risk factors to late-preterm deliveries and the contribution of these factors to deliveries with no recorded indication vs. indicated deliveries (deliveries with clinical indications).

The authors found that
"Our findings underscore the need for increased dialogue between providers and patients about the potential negative consequences of late-preterm delivery," conclude the authors.

Reddy UM, Ko C, Raju TNK, et al. 2009. Delivery indications of late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics 124(1):234-240. Abstract available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/124/1/234?rss=1.

Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library resources:

- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html

- Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html

************************************************************

4. ARTICLE ASSESSES HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' SIDS KNOWLEDGE AND WILLINGNESS TO DISCUSS SIDS WITH PARENTS

"If physicians are uncomfortable with their fund of knowledge about SIDS [sudden infant death syndrome], they may be reluctant to discuss it with families," state the authors of an article published in Health Promotion Practice online (ahead of print) on July 20, 2009. In spite of a 13-year public education campaign aimed at reducing the risk of SIDS, it remains the leading cause of postneonatal death and the third leading cause of infant death. The primary modifiable risk factor for SIDS is prone sleeping, but physicians, nurses, and other health professionals have been reluctant to stress the importance of putting infants to sleep on their backs, perhaps because of inadequate or incorrect knowledge or skepticism. Studies have shown that health professionals have substantial influence on parental choice of sleep position. This article reports on a study conducted to test the hypothesis that physicians in central New York were not adequately educated on SIDS and were not sufficiently emphasizing risk-reduction strategies with parents.

In 2002, researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 912 pediatricians, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists in the four Central New York counties. Survey components included (1) demographics, including specialty, years in practice, and practice setting; (2) knowledge of SIDS and risk factors; (3) practices regarding educating parents about SIDS, and (4) interest in inservice and further education on SIDS. A total of 214 surveys were returned, for a 23.5 percent response rate.

The authors found that:
The authors conclude that "a surprisingly large percentage of physicians lacked correct knowledge of SIDS and SIDS risk factors and did not provide parents with information on SIDS." They continue, "physicians need more education on the risks of SIDS, especially on sleeping position."

Eron NB, Dygert KM, Squillace C, et al. 2009. The physician’s role in reducing SIDS. Health Promotion Practice [published online ahead of print on July 20, 2009]. Abstract available at http://hpp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1524839909341033v1.

Readers: More information is available from the National Sudden and Unexpected Infant/Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center's Web site as follows:

- Training Toolkit at
http://sidscenter.org/trainingtoolkit.html

************************************************************

5. STUDY INCORPORATES CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE INTO THE HEALTHY START PROGRAM EVALUATION

"This study has demonstrated that outcomes of Healthy Start participants in eight sites compare favorably to national benchmarks. Noteworthy achievements include the high rate of breastfeeding and adherence to the 'back-to-sleep' recommendations among participants," state the authors of an article published in the Maternal and Child Health Journal online (ahead of print) on July 10, 2009. The article is one component of the national evaluation of the Healthy Start program. The authors present the results of a survey of Healthy Start participants in eight selected sites, which was designed to incorporate the consumer perspective into the national Healthy Start program evaluation.

Sites were selected because they had implemented all nine Healthy Start components and they captured the sociodemographic diversity of Healthy Start programs. Each site provided a data file containing contact information for the universe of participants who gave birth between October 2005 and June 2006. Women with infants ages 6-12 months participated in a telephone survey between October 2006 and January 2007. Measures included sociodemographic characteristics; health status and risk factors; health education, service use, and access to care; participant satisfaction; and perinatal health outcomes. The final response rate was 65.7 percent (N=646). To compensate for the absence of a control or comparison group, Healthy Start participant outcomes were assessed in relation to two national benchmarks: mothers with low incomes based on a sample from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) and Healthy People 2010 objectives. Although the analytic approach does not support conclusions related to the impact of Healthy Start, it does identify areas for improving health behaviors, service delivery, and participant outcomes.

The authors found that
"As the Healthy Start program enters its fourth phase, this study has implications for program improvements in the future," conclude the authors.

Rosenbach M, O'Neil S, Cook B, et al. 2009. Characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of Healthy Start participants in eight sites. Maternal and Child Health Journal [published online ahead of print on July 10, 2009]. http://www.springerlink.com/content/f72ql44127400217.

Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's Web site as follows:

- Healthy Start at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/about_healthystart.html

************************************************************

To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

************************************************************

To receive notice of new issues of MCH Alert, follow the MCH Library on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/MCH_Library.

************************************************************

MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is produced by Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health at Georgetown University under its cooperative agreements (U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal purposes.
 
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others. For all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.

The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions. Please contact us at the address below.

MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun

MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/index.html
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MCH_Library

************************************************************


************************************************************