
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
and Unexpected Infant/Child and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at
Georgetown University. This
and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
July 31, 2009
************************************************************
Special Notice: Thanks to all who have completed our 2009 Reader
Feedback Form. If you have not yet completed the form, please take a
few moments to complete the questions and submit your comments. You
will find the form online at
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=16ZJG5kXZgVQC_2bHc_2bxFH6A_3d_3d
************************************************************
1. Brief Features Home Visiting Resources
2. Promising Practice Series Focuses on Cultural and
Linguistic Competence in Addressing Perinatal Death
3. Authors Characterize Delivery
Indications for Late Preterm Births and Their Potential Impact on
Neonatal and Infant Mortality Rates
4. Article Assesses Health Professionals' SIDS Knowledge
and Willingness to Discuss SIDS with Parents
5. Study Incorporates Consumer Perspective into the
Healthy Start Program Evaluation
************************************************************
1. BRIEF FEATURES HOME VISITING RESOURCES
Home Visiting: Resource Brief contains information about home
visitation programs and the variety of family-focused services they
offer to pregnant women and families with new infants and young
children. The brief, produced by the Maternal and Child Health (MCH)
Library at Georgetown University, lists Web sites and related MCH
Library resources. Sample resources include testimonies and legislative
updates such as an overview of the home visitation component of the
president's fiscal-year 2010 budget proposal. Additional resources
include issue briefs, testimonies, and research findings; policy
statements; state and local program guidelines and examples;
professional- and consumer-education materials; documents on program
development, core competencies, supervision, and evaluation; curricula
and training; and Webinars. A guide for home visitors on educating
parents and caregivers about infant safe sleep is also provided. The
brief is available at http://mchlibrary.info/guides/homevisiting.html.
************************************************************
2. PROMISING PRACTICE SERIES FOCUSES ON CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC
COMPETENCE IN ADDRESSING PERINATAL DEATH
Organizational Policy Supports Families in Times of Crisis:
Fredericksburg, VA highlights key values, policies, and practices of
culturally and linguistically competent perinatal bereavement support.
The brief is part of the Promising Practices series produced by the
National Center for Cultural Competence at Georgetown University with
support from the Health Resources and Services Administration's
Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Topics include the challenge,
strategy, action, and why it works. The brief examines the impact of
demographic changes in the Fredericksburg, VA, area and outlines
efforts to create a structure to oversee and promote cultural and
linguistic competence throughout the area's health care system. The
authors discuss the role of the coordinator of cultural services in
supporting hospital staff to develop the knowledge, attitudes, and
skills to adapt the care they give to families and, specifically, to
meet cultural preferences and needs following a perinatal death. The
brief is available at http://www11.georgetown.edu/research/gucchd/nccc/documents/BEREAVE_virginiafinal.pdf.
************************************************************
3. AUTHORS CHARACTERIZE DELIVERY INDICATIONS FOR LATE PRETERM BIRTHS
AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NEONATAL AND INFANT MORTALITY RATES
"We found that 1 in 5 late-preterm deliveries occurred with no recorded
medical or obstetric indication," state the authors of an article
published in the July 2009 issue of Pediatrics. The preterm birth rate
has increased in the United States by 20 percent in 15 years, from 10.6
percent in 1990 to 12.7 percent in 2005. Infants born at 34 to 36 weeks
of gestation now account for 71 percent of all preterm births. This
subgroup, referred to as "late preterm," is growing at a faster rate
than any other preterm birth subgroup. Compared with term infants,
late-preterm infants manifest higher frequencies of neonatal and
postneonatal morbidities, higher rates of rehospitalization after
neonatal discharge, higher rates of neonatal and postneonatal
mortality, and significantly higher rates of major disabilities. Thus,
the increasing late-preterm birth rate should of great concern, because
the societal burden is profound. However, comprehensive studies that
address the reasons for the increasing rate of late-preterm births,
which may potentially lead to reduction strategies, are lacking. The
article presents findings from a study to determine why singleton
late-preterm births are taking place and to compare the delivery
implications with neonatal and infant mortality rates.
The study analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics
2001 birth cohort linked birth-death files of 3,483,496 singleton
births at 34 to 41 weeks of gestation. Neonatal and infant mortality
rates were calculated by week of gestation at birth and the indication
for delivery. Week 39 had the lowest neonatal mortality rate and was,
therefore, used as the reference week when comparing mortality by week
of delivery. Late-preterm births were classified by delivery
indications into the following five categories: (1) maternal medical
conditions; (2) obstetric complications; (3) major congenital
anomalies; (4) isolated spontaneous labor: vaginal delivery without
induction and without associated medical-obstetric factors; and (5) no
recorded indication: no documented indications. The analysis assessed
the association between selected maternal demographic and medical risk
factors to late-preterm deliveries and the contribution of these
factors to deliveries with no recorded indication vs. indicated
deliveries (deliveries with clinical indications).
The authors found that
- There were 292,627 singleton deliveries at 34 to 36 weeks of
gestation, representing 8.4 percent of singleton births from 34 to 41
weeks of gestation.
- There were 67,909 late preterm deliveries (23.2 percent)
classified as having no recorded indication.
- Deliveries with no recorded indication were associated
increasingly with higher maternal age; non-Hispanic white ethnicity;
maternal educational level 13 or more years; deliveries occurring in
the Midwest, South, and West regions of the Unites States; multiparity;
and a history of previous infant with a birthweight of 4000 g or less.
- Deliveries with no recorded indication had significantly higher
neonatal and infant mortality rates compared with deliveries attributed
to isolated spontaneous labor but lower neonatal and infant mortality
rates compared with deliveries associated with an obstetric indication
or congenital anomaly.
"Our findings underscore the need for increased dialogue between
providers and patients about the potential negative consequences of
late-preterm delivery," conclude the authors.
Reddy UM, Ko C, Raju TNK, et al. 2009. Delivery indications of
late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United
States. Pediatrics 124(1):234-240. Abstract available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/124/1/234?rss=1.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
- Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html
************************************************************
4. ARTICLE ASSESSES HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' SIDS KNOWLEDGE AND
WILLINGNESS TO DISCUSS SIDS WITH PARENTS
"If physicians are uncomfortable with their fund of knowledge about
SIDS [sudden infant death syndrome], they may be reluctant to discuss
it with families," state the authors of an article published in Health
Promotion Practice online (ahead of print) on July 20, 2009. In spite
of a 13-year public education campaign aimed at reducing the risk of
SIDS, it remains the leading cause of postneonatal death and the third
leading cause of infant death. The primary modifiable risk factor for
SIDS is prone sleeping, but physicians, nurses, and other health
professionals have been reluctant to stress the importance of putting
infants to sleep on their backs, perhaps because of inadequate or
incorrect knowledge or skepticism. Studies have shown that health
professionals have substantial influence on parental choice of sleep
position. This article reports on a study conducted to test the
hypothesis that physicians in central New York were not adequately
educated on SIDS and were not sufficiently emphasizing risk-reduction
strategies with parents.
In 2002, researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 912
pediatricians, family practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists in
the four Central New York counties. Survey components included (1)
demographics, including specialty, years in practice, and practice
setting; (2) knowledge of SIDS and risk factors; (3) practices
regarding educating parents about SIDS, and (4) interest in inservice
and further education on SIDS. A total of 214 surveys were returned,
for a 23.5 percent response rate.
The authors found that:
- Health professionals were asked seven questions. They answered a
mean number of 5.4 questions correctly.
- Almost all (88.8 percent) of health professionals were unaware
that 2 to 4 months is the age range associated with the highest
incidence of SIDS
- Fifty-seven health professionals (27 percent) were not able to
identify the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended supine position
as the safest infant sleep position.
- Almost all the health professionals (99.5 percent) agreed that
certain measures can be taken to reduce the risk for SIDS, and 97.6
percent agreed that it is important to discuss risk-reduction
strategies with every parent of an infant (ages 12 months or younger).
- When asked about the safest sleep position for a healthy infant
under age 6 months, 147 (69.7 percent) said the back, 53 (25.1 percent)
said the back or side is equally safe, 8 (3.8 percent) said the side,
and 3 (1.4 percent) said the stomach or side is equally safe.
- When asked about their practices regarding educating parents
about SIDS, 149 (70 percent) responded that they or someone in their
office routinely talks to parents of young infants about SIDS and SIDS
risk reduction.
The authors conclude that "a surprisingly large percentage of
physicians lacked correct knowledge of SIDS and SIDS risk factors and
did not provide parents with information on SIDS." They continue,
"physicians need more education on the risks of SIDS, especially on
sleeping position."
Eron NB, Dygert KM, Squillace C, et al. 2009. The physician’s role in
reducing SIDS. Health Promotion Practice [published online ahead of
print on July 20, 2009]. Abstract available at http://hpp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1524839909341033v1.
Readers: More information is available from the National Sudden and
Unexpected Infant/Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center's Web
site as follows:
- Training Toolkit at
http://sidscenter.org/trainingtoolkit.html
************************************************************
5. STUDY INCORPORATES CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE INTO THE HEALTHY START
PROGRAM EVALUATION
"This study has demonstrated that outcomes of Healthy Start
participants in eight sites compare favorably to national benchmarks.
Noteworthy achievements include the high rate of breastfeeding and
adherence to the 'back-to-sleep' recommendations among participants,"
state the authors of an article published in the Maternal and Child
Health Journal online (ahead of print) on July 10, 2009. The article is
one component of the national evaluation of the Healthy Start program.
The authors present the results of a survey of Healthy Start
participants in eight selected sites, which was designed to incorporate
the consumer perspective into the national Healthy Start program
evaluation.
Sites were selected because they had implemented all nine Healthy Start
components and they captured the sociodemographic diversity of Healthy
Start programs. Each site provided a data file containing contact
information for the universe of participants who gave birth between
October 2005 and June 2006. Women with infants ages 6-12 months
participated in a telephone survey between October 2006 and January
2007. Measures included sociodemographic characteristics; health status
and risk factors; health education, service use, and access to care;
participant satisfaction; and perinatal health outcomes. The final
response rate was 65.7 percent (N=646). To compensate for the absence
of a control or comparison group, Healthy Start participant outcomes
were assessed in relation to two national benchmarks: mothers with low
incomes based on a sample from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study
(ECLS) and Healthy People 2010 objectives. Although the analytic
approach does not support conclusions related to the impact of Healthy
Start, it does identify areas for improving health behaviors, service
delivery, and participant outcomes.
The authors found that
- More than 80 percent of Healthy Start participants reported that
they received health information concerning 13 selected topics after
they became pregnant. The three topics participants reported receiving
information on most often were eating healthy foods (reported by 96
percent), how to put their child to sleep (96 percent), and how to
breastfeed (93 percent).
- Unmet need was low for most of the health care services, with the
exception of dental appointments (11 percent reported they needed but
did not receive help), child care (11 percent) and housing (13 percent).
- The vast majority of Healthy Start participants were satisfied
with the services they received from Healthy Start and with their
interactions with Healthy Start staff.
- There was a gap in achieving the Healthy People 2010 objective of
99 percent for the elimination of smoking during pregnancy both for
Healthy Start participants (46 percent) and mothers with low incomes
more generally (53 percent).
- Overall, the low-birthweight rate at the Healthy Start sites (7.5
percent) was similar to the rate for mothers with low incomes in the
ECLS, but both rates were above the Healthy People 2010 objective (5
percent).
- Healthy Start participants' rates of ever breastfeeding (72
percent) and putting infants to sleep on their backs (70 percent) were
at or near the Healthy People 2010 objectives and considerably higher
than rates among mothers with low incomes in the ECLS.
"As the Healthy Start program enters its fourth phase, this study has
implications for program improvements in the future," conclude the
authors.
Rosenbach M, O'Neil S, Cook B, et al. 2009. Characteristics, access,
utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of Healthy Start participants
in eight sites. Maternal and Child Health Journal [published online
ahead of print on July 10, 2009]. http://www.springerlink.com/content/f72ql44127400217.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's Web site
as follows:
- Healthy Start at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/about_healthystart.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
************************************************************
To receive notice of new issues of MCH Alert, follow the MCH Library on
Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/MCH_Library.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health at Georgetown University under its
cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/index.html
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/MCH_Library
************************************************************
************************************************************