
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
May 9, 2008
1. E-Journal Focuses on Children and Electronic Media
2. Report Addresses Training Challenges in the Field of
Adolescent Medicine
3. Brief Highlights Key Findings on Breastfeeding in the
United States
4. Analysis Examines Missed Opportunities for Chlamydia
Screening of Young Women in the United States
5. Article Discusses an Intervention to Improve
Obstetrical Care
************************************************************
1. E-JOURNAL FOCUSES ON CHILDREN AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA
The spring 2008 issue of The Future of Children features nine articles
on the most common forms of electronic media in use today and their
influence on the well-being of children and adolescents. The e-journal,
published by Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and
International Affairs and the Brookings Institution, is organized by
children's outcomes and considers evidence separately for children vs.
adolescents, boys vs. girls, and advantaged vs. disadvantaged children.
Topics include how exposure to different media forms is linked with
such aspects of child well-being as school achievement, cognition,
engagement in extracurricular activities, social interaction with peers
and family, aggression, fear and anxiety, risky behaviors, and healthy
lifestyle choices. The full text issue, executive summary, and policy
brief are available at http://www.futureofchildren.org/pubs-info2825/pubs-info_show.htm?doc_id=674322.
************************************************************
2. REPORT ADDRESSES TRAINING CHALLENGES IN THE FIELD OF ADOLESCENT
MEDICINE
Adolescent Medicine at the Crossroads: A Review of Fellowship Training
and Recommendations for Reform examines the current state of adolescent
medicine fellowship programs and offers recommendations for
strengthening recruitment and building the field of adolescent
medicine. The report is based on findings from a literature review, key
informant interviews, and a new comprehensive survey of adolescent
medicine fellowship program directors conducted by Incenter Strategies
in spring 2007. Also included are selected findings from two other
recent Incenter Strategies surveys conducted in summer 2007: one of
pediatric residency program directors and the other of adolescent
medicine faculty responsible for the 1-month pediatric residency
rotation. Topics include the supply and recruitment of adolescent
medicine fellows; the nature and content of clinical, research, and
leadership training; and the institutional and financial challenges
facing training programs today. The report is available at http://www.incenterstrategies.org/jan07/specialreport.pdf.
************************************************************
3. BRIEF HIGHLIGHTS KEY FINDINGS ON BREASTFEEDING IN THE UNITED STATES
"Breastfeeding rates in the United States have increased significantly
among infants born between 1993-1994 and 2005-2006," state the authors
of an April 2008 data brief published by the National Center for Health
Statistics. The report summarizes information on breastfeeding rates in
the United States based on data from the 1999-2006 National Health and
Nutrition Examination Surveys. Results are reported for the total U.S.
population and three race-and-ethnicity groups by birth-year cohort.
Overall, the authors found that
- In 2005-2006, breastfeeding rates exceeded the Healthy People
2010 goals of 75%.
- Breastfeeding rates at age 6 months did not achieve the Healthy
People 2010 target goal of 50%.
- Breastfeeding rates were associated with race and ethnicity,
maternal age, and family income status.
"These findings underscore the need to continue breastfeeding promotion
and intervention activities that target diverse populations," conclude
the authors.
McDowell MM, Wang C, Kennedy-Stephenson J. 2008. Breastfeeding in the
United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Surveys, 1999-2006. NCHS data briefs, no. 5. Hyattsville,
MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db05.htm.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Breastfeeding -- Selected Resources at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/guides/breastfeeding.html
************************************************************
4. ANALYSIS EXAMINES MISSED OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHLAMYDIA SCREENING
OF YOUNG WOMEN IN THE UNITED STATES
"The encounters that women have with physicians in ambulatory care
offices present opportunities for chlamydia testing . . . , yet these
opportunities are usually missed," state the authors of an article
published in the May 2008 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Chlamydial infections are common among women in the United States.
Untreated or inadequately treated chlamydia may progress to pelvic
inflammatory disease, with its possible sequelae of tubal infertility,
ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain. Chlamydial infections are
asymptomatic in most women, making screening important for case
finding. According to National Committee for Quality Assurance
estimates, during 2005, among sexually active young women, only about
35% with commercial insurance and 50% with Medicaid were tested for
chlamydia. The article presents findings from an analysis to estimate
the proportion of visits where the opportunity to conduct a chlamydia
test in a nonpregnant woman was missed in the United States.
Data for the analysis were drawn from the 2005 National Ambulatory
Medical Care Survey, an annual, national probability survey of
non-federal, office-based U.S. physicians listed in the American
Medical Association and the American Osteopathic Association master
files. Physicians were instructed to list all patient office visits
during an assigned 1-week period, and approximately 30 of these
patients were randomly selected for patient-record-form data entry. The
analysis estimated the total number of ambulatory care visits to
obstetrician-gynecologists and to primary care physicians (general and
family practitioners, internists, and pediatricians) made by
nonpregnant young women ages 15-25 during 2005; the proportion of these
visits that were conducted by physician specialty; and the proportions
of these visits for preventive care, pelvic examinations, Pap testing,
and urinalysis, stratified by physician specialty. Of the visits to an
obstetrician-gynecologist made by nonpregnant young women ages 15-25,
the researchers estimated the proportion of visits where a chlamydia
test was not done in women whose major reason for the visit, according
to the physician, was preventive care; in women who had a pelvic
examination; and in women who had a Pap test. Of the visits to primary
care physicians made by nonpregnant young women ages 15-25, the
researchers estimated proportion of preventive care visits and visits
with a urinalysis where a chlamydia test was not done.
The authors found that
- Young women ages 15-25 had 15.1 million visits to
obstetrician-gynecologists during 2005; 6.3 million of these visits
were made by nonpregnant women. Young women in this age group had 21.9
million visits to primary care physicians, and 20.9 million of these
visits were made by nonpregnant women.
- Although obstetrician-gynecologists conducted only 23.1% of all
visits, they conducted 35.7% of the preventive care visits, 68.8% of
visits with pelvic examinations, and 71.1% of visits with Pap tests.
- General and family practitioners conducted 24.6% of preventive
care visits, and internists and pediatricians together conducted 39.7%
of preventive care visits. Primary care physicians conducted 77.5% of
visits with urinalyses.
- Among obstetrician-gynecologists, a chlamydia test was not done
at 84.0% of visits for preventive care, 82.1% of visits where a pelvic
examination was done, and 77.3% of visits where a Pap test was done.
- Among primary care physicians, a chlamydia test was not done at
93.2% of visits for preventive care and 99.1% of visits where a
urinalysis was done.
"Although all physicians who provide health care to young women should
be included in interventions designed to increase screening, it is
especially important to target obstetrician-gynecologists and primary
care physicians," state the authors. They conclude that physicians in
these specialties would benefit from provider education efforts to
increase knowledge of chlamydia epidemiology and morbidity, structural
interventions, and incentive programs designed to increase screening
rates.
Hoover K, Tao G. 2008. Missed opportunities for chlamydia screening of
young women in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology
111(5):1097-1102. Abstract available at http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/5/1097.
************************************************************
5. ARTICLE DISCUSSES AN INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE OBSTETRICAL CARE
"Our multifaceted intervention increased the adoption of evidence-based
clinical-management guidelines and changed birth attendants' attitudes
regarding active management of the third stage of labor and the use of
episiotomy," state the authors of an article published in the May 1,
2008, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Use of
evidence-based guidelines improves quality of care; however, in
maternity hospitals in the United States and Latin America, such
guidelines are often underused, whereas ineffective or harmful
practices continue to be used. This article reports on a multi-faceted
intervention to facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices in
maternity hospitals in Argentina and Uruguay.
Researchers used a cluster-randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the
behavior and attitudes of birth attendants in 19 hospitals in Argentina
and Uruguay with respect to two evidence-based recommendations for
obstetrical practice: the selective (vs. routine) use of episiotomy and
active management of the third stage of labor (prophylactic use of
oxytocin, traction on the umbilical cord, and uterine massage). One
group of hospitals was assigned to receive an 18-month multi-faceted
behavioral intervention to develop and implement guidelines for the use
of episiotomy and management of the third stage of labor. The control
group of hospitals received no intervention. Primary outcomes were
rates of prophylactic use of oxytocin during the third stage of labor
and use of episiotomy. Secondary outcomes were the rate of use of
perineal suturing, postpartum hemorrhage, and birth attendants'
readiness to change their behavior with regard to episiotomies and
management of the third stage of labor.
The authors found that
- The rate of prophylactic use of oxytocin increased from 2.1% to
83.6% in the intervention hospitals and from 2.6% to 12.3% in the
control hospitals.
- The intervention was associated with a decrease in the median
episiotomy rate in intervention hospitals from 41.1% at baseline to
29.9% at the end of the intervention; the rate was stable in control
hospitals.
- The intervention was associated with a statistically significant
reduction in all postpartum hemorrhage indicators -- the rate of
postpartum hemorrhage of 500 ml or more, the rate of postpartum
hemorrhage of 1,000 ml or more, and the mean amount of postpartum blood
loss.
- There was no evidence of an effect on other secondary outcome
measures, although the study was not powered to exclude potentially
important but rare clinical effects.
- In the intervention hospitals, the median rate of birth
attendants' readiness to change increased from 14.4% to 55.9%, whereas
the rate in the control hospitals remained stable.
- At the 1-year follow-up, the median rate of prophylactic use of
oxytocin remained high in the intervention hospitals and low in the
control hospitals. Also at the 1-year follow-up, the median episiotomy
rate at intervention hospitals remained low, and the rate at control
hospitals remained high.
The authors conclude that "Not only did the intervention result in an
absolute increase of 68% in the prophylactic use of oxytocin during the
third stage of labor and an absolute reduction of 11% in the use of
episiotomy, but also these practices remained stable at the 1-year
follow-up."
Althabe F, Buekens P, Bergel E, et al. 2008. A behavioral intervention
to improve obstetrical care. New England Journal of Medicine
358(18):1929-1940. Abstract available at http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/358/18/1929?rss=1&query=current.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Preconception and Pregnancy -- Knowledge Path (section on Childbirth)
at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html#Childbirth
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2008 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************