
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
March 14, 2008
1. New Bullying-Prevention Toolkit Released
2. Brief Outlines Key Findings From Past Responsible
Father Initiatives
3. Funders Discuss Efforts to Integrate Mental Health and
Oral Health into Children's Health Care
4. Article Looks at Interrelationships Among
Obesity-Prevention Behaviors in Children and Adolescents
5. Study Examines Association Between Having Sex At a
Young Age with an Older Partner and Selected Outcomes in Young Adulthood
************************************************************
Readers: The next issue of the MCH Alert will be published on March 28,
2008.
************************************************************
1. NEW BULLYING-PREVENTION TOOLKIT RELEASED
Eyes on Bullying . . . What Can You Do? A Toolkit to Prevent Bullying
In Children's Lives offers a variety of tools to help parents and other
caregivers understand bullying in a new way, reexamine their knowledge
and beliefs about bullying, and shape the beliefs and behaviors of the
children in their care. The toolkit, created at Education Development
Center, is designed especially for parents and other caregivers of
preschool- and school-age children and adolescents to use in child care
programs, after-school programs, and camps. Topics include (1) the
issue of bullying; (2) why bullying can sometimes be difficult to see;
(3) the concepts of bully, victim, and bystander; (4) recommendations
and strategies for addressing bullying when it occurs; (5) a strategic
approach to creating an environment where everyone takes responsibility
for preventing bullying; and (6) resources and references on bullying
prevention. The toolkit is available at http://www.eyesonbullying.org/pdfs/toolkit.pdf.
All the content from the toolkit and additional information, materials,
and resources are available from the Eyes on Bullying Web site at http://www.eyesonbullying.org.
************************************************************
2. BRIEF OUTLINES KEY FINDINGS FROM PAST RESPONSIBLE FATHER INITIATIVES
Ten Key Findings from Responsible Fatherhood Initiatives focuses on
fatherhood programs that were developed and implemented during the
1990s and early 2000s and assesses what has been learned and how to
build on the early programs' successes. The brief, produced by the
Urban Institute, discusses key findings from five demonstration
programs that focused on improving employment and earnings, child
support payments, and parental involvement among noncustodial fathers
with low incomes. Listed in order of implementation, these programs
include the Young Unwed Fathers Project, Parents' Fair Share, programs
for nonresident fathers operated under the Welfare-to-Work Grants
Program, the Office of Child Support Enforcement's Responsible
Fatherhood Programs, and the Partners for Fragile Families. Common
themes across the projects are discussed in detail, and key findings
are presented in a table, by project. The brief is intended for program
administrators, policymakers, and others to use in developing the next
generation of policies and services that will improve the lives of men
with low incomes and their families. The brief is available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411623_fatherhood_initiatives.pdf.
************************************************************
3. FUNDERS DISCUSS EFFORTS TO INTEGRATE MENTAL HEALTH AND ORAL HEALTH
INTO CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE
Critical Services for Our Children: Integrating Mental and Oral Health
into Primary Care presents a summary of a discussion among grantmakers
and health services researchers about improving the children's health
care system by better integrating oral and mental health services into
primary care. The issue brief is based on a Grantmakers in Health Issue
Dialogue held on April 17, 2007, that focused on strategies for
reducing fragmentation of services and explored opportunities for
health funders. An overview of the issue, possible solutions, a
conclusion, and references are provided. Topics include challenges to
an integrated children's health system and examples of how health
funders are addressing the problems. The issue brief is available at http://www.gih.org/usr_doc/Issue_Brief_30.pdf.
An executive summary is also available at http://www.gih.org/usr_doc/Executive_Summary_Issue_Brief_30.pdf.
************************************************************
4. ARTICLE LOOKS AT INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG OBESITY-PREVENTION
BEHAVIORS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
"The prevalence of behavioral risks for obesity increased across
samples of ES [elementary school], MS [middle school], and HS [high
school] students," conclude the authors of an article published in the
March 2008 issue of Preventive Medicine. Research shows that children
and adolescents are not engaging in obesity-prevention behaviors at
recommended levels, contributing to an increasing prevalence of
overweight and obesity. The main objectives of the present study were
to examine among ES, MS, and HS students the following two research
questions: (1) how do the stage-of-change distributions compare across
the age groups and (2) how are obesity-prevention behaviors (engaging
in 60 minutes of physical activity [PA] at least 5 days a week,
consuming 5 or more servings of fruit and vegetables per day (FV), and
spending 2 hours or less watching television, videos, or DVDs [TV])
interrelated? Stage of change refers to the Transtheoretical Model,
according to which people pass through five stages of change as they
make behavior changes: (1) precontemplation (PC) -- not intending to
change in the foreseeable future, (2) contemplation (C) -- intending to
change in the next 6 months, (3) preparation (PR) -- intending to
change in the next 30 days, (4) action (A) -- changed within the last 6
months, and (5) maintenance (M): changed more than 6 months ago.
A total of 4,091 students were recruited from 24 elementary, 8 middle,
and 12 high schools in 22 states. Students were asked if they engaged
in the recommended level for each behavior. If they did not, they were
asked if they intended to do so, according to the PC, C, and PR
definitions. If they met the criterion, they were asked how long they
had been doing so, according to the A and M definitions.
The authors found that
- For PA, the percentages of students at risk (i.e., not meeting
the criterion) increased by nearly 28 percentage points from ES to HS.
- For FV, the percentages of students at risk increased by 24
percentage points between ES and HS.
- For TV, the percentages of students at risk decreased by 27
percentage points between ES and HS.
- With the exception of FV and TV among MS students, being at risk
for one behavior significantly increased the likelihood of being at
risk for the other behaviors across all groups.
The authors state that "for young students already at-risk . . . ,
interventions should focus on removing barriers and increasing
self-efficacy to move them along the stages toward effective action in
accordance with the TTM. For students not yet at-risk, interventions
should focus on maintaining healthy behaviors and preventing relapse to
pre-Action stages."
Driskell MM, Dyment S, Mauriello L. 2008. Relationships among multiple
behaviors for childhood and adolescent obesity prevention. Preventive
Medicine 46(3):209-215. Abstract available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WPG-4PB0PH3-1&_user=655954&_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=7&_fmt=summary&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%236990%232008%23999539996%23682007%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=6990&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=18&_acct=C000035538&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=655954&md5=1a941b8819284d82cc0a0c86f6bd4a3e.
Readers: More information about multiple health behavior change
research is available in the March 2008 issue of Preventive Medicine.
Topics include (among others) patterns and correlates of multiple risk
behaviors in overweight women, clusters of lifestyle behaviors, and
physical activity as a gateway to behavior for diet. Abstracts of the
articles are available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00917435#.
************************************************************
5. STUDY EXAMINES ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HAVING SEX AT A YOUNG AGE WITH AN
OLDER PARTNER AND SELECTED OUTCOMES IN YOUNG ADULTHOOD
"Our work adds to a growing body of evidence that the combination of
having sex at a young age and having an older sexual partner is
particularly detrimental, especially for STD [sexually transmitted
disease] outcomes among females," state the authors of an article
published in the March 2008 issue of Perspectives on Sexual and
Reproductive Health. Although a growing body of research highlights a
link between having sex at a young age with an older partner and poorer
reproductive health outcomes through high school, little research
examines outcomes during the transition to young adulthood (after high
school and through the early 20s). The study described in the article
examined whether the negative influences of having sex at a young age
with an older partner extend into young adulthood and whether these
associations differ for males and females.
Data for the study were drawn from all three waves of the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a nationally
representative school-based study of students in grades 7-12 that
allowed the researchers to control for a range of individual and family
characteristics to address the following questions: (1) Is having sex
at a young age with an older partner associated with the risk of
acquiring an STD or being involved in an adolescent or nonmarital birth
by young adulthood? (2) Are any observed associations affected by
characteristics of adolescents' relationship history? (3) Do
associations differ for males and females?
The authors found that
- Approximately 10% of females had had sex before age 16 with an
older partner, compared with 2% of males.
- Females who had had sex before age 16 with an older partner had
at least twice as high odds of testing positive for an STD as those who
had had sex before age 16 with a similar-aged partner and as those who
had sex at age 16 or older with an older partner.
- Males who had had sex before age 16 had twice as high odds of
testing positive for an STD as those who had delayed first sex,
regardless of partner age difference. The association remained in the
model controlling for individual- and family-level controls, but not in
the model that included relationship history.
"Young females who engage in early sexual activity with older partners
are at especially high risk of adverse reproductive health
consequences," the authors conclude, adding that "programs that address
characteristics of healthy romantic relationships and highlight
problems associated with potentially unequal power dynamics between
partners could benefit both males and females."
Ryan S, Franzetta K, Manlove JS, et al. 2008. Older sexual partners
during adolescence: Links to reproductive health outcomes in young
adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 40(1):17-26.
Abstract available at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1363/4001708.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's resource,
Sexuality Education, http://www.mchlibrary.info/guides/sexuality.html.
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2008 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************