
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
Infant Death Resource Center. This and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
February 29, 2008
1. Review Examines Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in
Pregnancy
2. Study Compares Risk Factors for SIDS and Apparent
Life-Threatening Events
3. Article Describes the Development and Implementation
of a Tool to Screen for Psychosocial Risks
4. Authors Look at the Effects of Late-Preterm Birth and
Maternal Medical Conditions on Newborn Morbidity Risk
************************************************************
1. REVIEW EXAMINES SCREENING FOR BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN PREGNANCY
"New treatment trial data pooled with 2001 report data showed no
benefit to screening and treating women who are asymptomatic for
bacterial vaginosis if they had a low or average risk for preterm
delivery for the outcomes of delivery before 37, 34, or 32 weeks;
preterm, premature rupture of membranes; or low birthweight," state the
authors of an article published in the February 5, 2008, issue of the
Annals of Internal Medicine. Preterm birth rates have increased in the
past decade, and strong epidemiologic evidence has suggested an
association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth. After
decades of research and with heightened awareness of measuring
potential adverse effects of medications, evidence is emerging that the
drug being used to treat bacterial vaginosis may, at some doses and for
some populations, be triggering adverse pregnancy outcomes. At the same
time, evidence suggests that inherent differences in populations, such
as previous pregnancy complications, gestational age, ethnicity, or
co-infection, may also influence which women are helped or harmed by
screening and treatment for bacterial vaginosis. This review was
conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to
update its 2001 recommendations by examining the evidence on the value
of screening for and treating bacterial vaginosis in reducing adverse
pregnancy outcomes for asymptomatic women at low, average, and high
risk for preterm delivery.
Relevant studies were identified from searches of Cochrane databases,
Ovid MEDLINE, reference lists of other systematic reviews, individuals
studies, editorials, reports, and Web sites and by consulting experts.
Selected studies included systematic reviews and individual randomized,
controlled trials that evaluated screening, treatment, pregnancy
outcomes, or adverse effects for asymptomatic women with bacterial
vaginosis. Data on the studies' design, sample, setting, demographic
characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, diagnostic methods,
and risk factors were extracted. Pregnancy outcome data were also
abstracted. Relevance and internal validity were evaluated using
pre-defined study-quality criteria and rating systems. The researchers
performed a series of meta-analyses that included new studies
identified from the search, as well as from studies identified from the
previous review, to estimate the effect of treatment on preterm
delivery (less than 37 weeks, less than 34 weeks, or less than 32
weeks); low birthweight; and preterm, premature rupture of membranes.
The authors found that
- There were no studies that compared pregnancy outcomes for women
who are asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis in a screened population
vs. a non-screened population.
- Seven new randomized, controlled trials were included in the area
of treatment of asymptomatic pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis.
- There was substantial heterogeneity among trials of treatment in
the high-risk group; projections suggest that although a subgroup of
high-risk women may benefit from screening and treatment for bacterial
vaginosis in pregnancy, a sizeable group would receive no benefit or
might experience harm.
"Studies to date of bacterial vaginosis in asymptomatic pregnant
women have not provided sufficient numbers or details to identify the
specific factors playing the most prominent role for harms or
benefits," state the authors. They conclude that "more research is
needed to better understand these groups and the conditions under which
treatment can be harmful or helpful and to explore relevance to other
adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm delivery before 34 weeks."
Nygren P, Rongwel F, Freeman M, et al. 2008. Evidence on the benefits
and harms of screening and treating pregnant women who are asymptomatic
for bacterial vaginosis: An update review for the U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 148(3):220-233.
Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf08/bv/bvup.pdf.
Readers: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Summary of
Recommendations and supporting documents are available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbvag.htm.
************************************************************
2. STUDY COMPARES RISK FACTORS FOR SIDS AND APPARENT LIFE-THREATENING
EVENTS
"Although a number of epidemiologic risk factors for ALTE [apparent
life-threatening event] seem to be similar to those for SIDS [sudden
infant death syndrome], several important differences have emerged,"
state the authors of an article published in the March 2008 issue of
The Journal of Pediatrics. An ALTE is defined as "an episode that is
frightening to the observer and characterized by some combination of
apnea (central or occasionally obstructive), color change (usually
cyanotic or pallid but occasionally etythematous or plethoric), marked
change in muscle tone (usually limpness), choking or gagging." ALTEs
historically designated as "near-miss for SIDS" have been considered
"aborted SIDS" deaths. However, the presumed relationship between ALTEs
and SIDS has recently been questioned. The article presents findings
from a study to address whether ALTEs are significantly related to SIDS.
Data for the study were drawn from a retrospective examination of 153
cases of infants with an ALTE in the Collaborative Home Infant
Monitoring Evaluation (CHIME), a multicenter study conducted between
1994 and 1998 with support from the National Institute for Child Health
and Human Development. SIDS studies selected for comparison were
population-based, had sizable numbers (more than 100 subjects), and
were based on infants who died of SIDS during the same decade that the
infants with an ALTE participated in the CHIME study. The following
indicators were selected for comparison between CHIME ALTE and SIDS
studies: male gender, small for gestational age (SGA; calculated based
on weight both at birth and at the time of the ALTE), low birthweight,
very low birthweight, multiparity, maternal age 20 or younger, maternal
smoking, and infant age less than 2 months at event. The analysis
assessed whether the risk of an attribute for infants with an ALTE was
significantly different from the risk of the same attribute for infants
who died of SIDS.
The authors found that, of the characteristics that differed from the
well-established risk factors for SIDS, four stood out:
- SGA status at birth was normal in infants with an ALTE but
elevated in those who died of SIDS.
- Fewer CHIME infants with an ALTE were low birthweight, compared
with those who died of SIDS.
- The age distribution of ALTE mothers corresponded to the ages of
mothers within the general population, whereas SIDS mothers were
disproportionately younger.
- ALTE peaked during the first 2 months of life, whereas SIDS
peaked at between 2 and 4 months.
"The differences warrant assigning ALTEs a separate status from SIDS,"
conclude the authors. They suggest that "a dissociation of ALTEs and
SIDS should promote more adequate research studies of ALTEs in the
future."
Esani N, Hodgman JE, Ehsani N, et al. 2008. Apparent life-threatening
events and sudden infant death syndrome: Comparison of risk factors.
The Journal of Pediatrics 152(3):365-370. Abstract available at http://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(07)00751-2/abstract?issue_key=&issue_preview=no&search_preview=no&select2=no&select2=no&start=&startPage=.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Knowledge Path: Infant Mortality at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_smokingpreg.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_smokingpreg&-search
- Infant Mortality (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_infmortality.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_infmortality&-search
- Infant Mortality Prevention (organizations resource list) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_infmort.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_infmort&-search
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE DESCRIBES DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TOOL TO SCREEN
FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL RISKS
"The development and successful implementation of a multi-dimensional
prenatal screening tool is one key step towards ultimately determining
the relationship between specific risk factors and poor birth
outcomes," state the authors of an article published in the February
2008 issue of the Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved.
Racial disparities in birth outcomes have persisted in the United
States for decades. One major effort to reduce racial disparities is
the federal Healthy Start initiative, which funds 97 community-based
programs designed to reduce infant mortality, low birthweight, and
preterm birth through outreach activities, risk screening, health
education, and case-management services. However, evaluating the impact
of these and other prenatal interventions has been hampered by the lack
of clear and consistent definitions of risk, validated screening
instruments, and universal screening. The purpose of the study
described in this article was to test the feasibility of systematically
administering a structured screening interview and protocol for
psychosocial risk (the Prenatal Risk Overview [PRO]) to all prenatal
clients at community clinics that are involved with the Healthy Start
Program in Minneapolis-St. Paul, and to gauge whether the process was
acceptable to clients and health professionals. The study also examined
the prevalence, co-occurrence, and inter-correlations of self-reported
psychosocial factors.
The study sample included 1,386 pregnant women screened between
November 2005 and April 2007. Ninety-five percent were women of color;
77% were not married. The PRO screened for the following 13
psychosocial risk factors associated with poor birth outcomes: lack of
telephone access, lack of transportation, food insecurity, housing
instability, lack of social support, intimate partner violence, other
physical/sexual abuse, depression, cigarette smoking, alcohol use,
illicit drug use, legal system involvement, and child protection
involvement.
The authors found that participants were classified at moderate or high
risk for the following risk factors at the following rates:
- Housing instability: 48%.
- Food insecurity: 32%.
- Lack of social support: 75%.
- Intimate partner violence: 7%.
- Other physical/sexual abuse: 9%.
- Depression: 18%.
- Cigarette use: 23%.
- Alcohol use: 23%.
- Drug use: 25%.
The authors conclude that "quantifying these relationships [between
specific risk factors and poor birth outcomes] better is essential to
evaluating the extent to which appropriate and timely psychosocial
interventions reduce infant mortality, preterm births, and low birth
weights."
Harrison PA, Sidebottom AC. 2008. Systematic prenatal screening for
psychosocial risks. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
19(1):258-276. Abstract available at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_health_care_for_the_poor_and_underserved/v019/19.1harrison.html.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Knowledge Path: Domestic Violence at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_domviolence.html
- Smoking During Pregnancy (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_smokingpreg.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_smokingpreg&-search
- Substance Use During Pregnancy (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_subusepreg.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_subusepreg&-search
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS LOOK AT THE EFFECTS OF LATE-PRETERM BIRTH AND MATERNAL
MEDICAL CONDITIONS ON NEWBORN MORBIDITY RISK
"Our study findings indicate that the risk for newborn morbidity
increases twofold with each earlier week of gestation, beginning at 38
weeks' gestation until 34 weeks' gestation," state the authors of an
article published in the February 2008 issue of Pediatrics. Preterm
delivery is the most important determinant of neonatal morbidity and
mortality in developed countries. Late preterm births (34-36 weeks'
gestation) accounted for 74% of all preterm births in 2002. Past
research on short- and long-term morbidity among late-preterm infants
has been limited, and earlier studies have not comprehensively examined
the association between preexisting maternal medical conditions and
newborn morbidity among late-preterm infants. In the population-based
study described in this article, the authors compared term infants
(37-41 weeks' gestation) to late-preterm infants and assessed the
independent and joint effects of late-preterm birth and selected
maternal medical conditions on the development of newborn morbidity
during the birth hospitalization. The authors created a new,
high-threshold measure of morbidity using information available via
infants' hospital discharge records, including diagnosis, length of
hospital stay, and transfer to another facility, as well as mortality
available from the infant death certificate. Eight maternal medical
conditions were also examined: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
(HDP), diabetes, antepartum hemorrhage, lung disease, infection,
cardiac disease, renal disease, and genital herpes.
The authors used a cohort of singleton, late-preterm and term infants
born in Massachusetts hospitals to Massachusetts residents. Data
available for this analysis were from January 1, 1998, through November
30, 2003. The final study population included 26,170 infants born at
34-36 weeks' gestation and 377,638 infants born at 37-41 weeks'
gestation.
The authors found that
- Overall, 22% of the late-preterm infants and 3.0% of the term
infants had morbidity during their birth hospitalization.
- Morbidity rates approximately double for each additional
gestational week earlier than 38 weeks, from 5.9% morbidity at 37 weeks
to 51.7% at 34 weeks.
- The risk for newborn morbidity was greater than additive when
both risk factors (being born preterm and being born to a mother with
one of the eight selected maternal medical conditions) were present
compared with when neither was present.
- Later-preterm infants with mothers who had antepartum hemorrhage
and HDP had the highest risks for newborn morbidity.
The authors conclude that "Because some maternal medical conditions are
potentially preventable and/or amenable to treatment, early recognition
and better treatment of women with chronic and pregnancy-related health
conditions may decrease the rates of newborn morbidity in all infants
but especially in late-preterm infants."
Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Tomashek KM, Kotelchuk M, et al. 2008. Effect of
late-preterm birth and maternal medical conditions on newborn morbidity
risk. Pediatrics 121(2):e223-e232. Available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/121/2/e223.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's resources:
- Knowledge Path: Preconception and Pregnancy at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html
- Prematurity (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_premature.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_premature&-search
- Prenatal Care (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_prenatal.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_prenatal&-search
- Maternal Morbidity and Mortality (organizations resource list) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_matmort.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_matmort&-search
- Prenatal Care (organizations resource list) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_prenat.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_prenat&-search
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2008 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************