
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
Infant Death Resource Center. This and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
November 30, 2007
1. Campaign Promotes Safer Infant Sleep Environment
Through Crib Giveaways and Education
2. Summary of State Laws Related to Sudden Infant Death
Updated
3. Article Provides Information About Second Trimester
Pregnancy Loss
4. Lancet Seminar Examines Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
5. Authors Explore Differences in Mortality Between
Late-Preterm and Term Infants
************************************************************
Special Notice: The Maternal and Child Health Library, in collaboration
with the National Sudden Infant Death Resource Center, is pleased to
produce this inaugural issue of MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality, a
free electronic newsletter that will be issued on the last Friday of
each month. The newsletter will feature research findings, policy
developments, recently released publications, and new programs and
initiatives related to sudden infant death, miscarriage, stillbirth,
other infant death, and related topics. We encourage you to forward MCH
Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality to others who may share the goal of
reducing infant mortality and promoting healthy outcomes for infants
from the prenatal period through the first year of life and beyond.
The Maternal and Child Health Library and the National Sudden Infant
Death Resource Center are co-located at Georgetown University’s
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health and are
supported with funding from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Your questions, comments, and suggestions are welcome.
************************************************************
1. CAMPAIGN PROMOTES SAFER INFANT SLEEP ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CRIB
GIVEAWAYS AND EDUCATION
Bedtime Basics for Babies is a national campaign designed to give
families both the equipment and the information they need to ensure a
safe sleep environment for infants. The Bedtime Basics campaign,
initially launched by First Candle in April 2007, builds on the success
of the national Back to Sleep campaign in reducing the risk of sudden
infant death, while also emphasizing other aspects of infant sleep
surroundings. In response to growing national concern about the number
of infants dying in unsafe sleep conditions, the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation recently awarded First Candle a multimillion-dollar grant to
combine two components: (1) a crib-distribution component for families
in need and at risk and (2) a public- and professional-education
component. During the 7-year initiative, First Candle will work with
public and private groups already involved with new parents and
infant-mortality prevention in the target states of Indiana and
Washington, as well as in the District of Columbia. A research team
will track families who receive cribs, information, and support on safe
sleep practices starting before their infant is born through the first
year. The team will also follow infant death patterns in the targeted
states. More information is available at http://www.firstcandle.org/bedtimebasics.
************************************************************
2. SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS RELATED TO SUDDEN INFANT DEATH UPDATED
50 State Summary of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) Laws highlights
the significant variance in scope and subject of U.S. state laws
related to SIDS. The issue brief, updated in November 2007 by the
National Conference of State Legislatures, provides a list of U.S.
states and political jurisdictions with existing SIDS laws, along with
a summary of each state's statute. Each statute is linked to more
information. Selected topics include states' SIDS definitions; SIDS
guidance for coroners or medical examiners and protocol for autopsies;
SIDS advisory councils, education programs, or counseling programs;
SIDS training for child care workers, firefighters, emergency medical
technicians, or law-enforcement officials; SIDS data collection or
research; and SIDS education requirements for child care workers.
Background information, such as a common definition of SIDS, the
incidence of SIDS, and federal initiatives to educate parents and other
caregivers about SIDS risk reduction, is also provided. The brief is
available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/sidsleg.htm.
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE PROVIDES INFORMATION ABOUT SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY LOSS
"After a second trimester loss, all patients warrant a thorough history
and physical examination to look for factors that might predispose them
to another loss," state the authors of an article published in the
November 1, 2007, issue of American Family Physician. In this article,
the authors review the factors associated with pregnancy loss and
provide information about etiologies of second trimester pregnancy loss
and about general assessment and follow-up.
Factors Associated with Pregnancy Loss
- Factors associated with pregnancy loss include, but are not
limited to, chromosomal abnormalities, congenital abnormalities,
various maternal factors (e.g., anatomic factors, endocrinopathy,
immunologic factors, infection, severe acute illness, thrombophilia,
uncontrolled chronic illness), fetal growth restriction, drug use,
ectopic pregnancy, smoking, and trauma. Causation is well established
for only chromosomal and fetal structural problems. The cause of
pregnancy loss remains unexplained in up to 50% of cases.
Etiologies of Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss
- Chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to their role in first
trimester pregnancy loss, chromosomal abnormalities also cause
pregnancy loss in the second trimester.
- Fetal and maternal anatomic factors. Pregnancy loss can be caused
by structural abnormalities resulting from uncontrolled maternal
diabetes at conception, neural tube defects, amniotic band syndrome, or
maternal exposure to teratogens. Major uterine anomalies have
traditionally been associated with second trimester pregnancy loss.
Cervical insufficiency or incompetence is classically associated with
second trimester pregnancy loss, as well.
- Thrombophilia. A meta-analysis of 31 studies of the effect of
thrombophilic disorders in pregnancy loss showed that a nonrecurrent
pregnancy loss after 20 to 24 weeks' gestation is associated with
factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency, and the prothrombin G20210A
mutation.
- Infection. Infection has been implicated in 10% to 25% of second
trimester pregnancy losses.
General Assessment and Follow-up
- History and physical examination. After a second trimester
pregnancy loss, a thorough workup should be done, ideally during
preconception counseling.
- Disease management and counseling. Detailed workup and management
of many of the maternal factors associated with second trimester
pregnancy loss often require referral to an obstetrician or
perinatologist; however, the family physician can still play an
important role.
- Psychological factors. The family physician is in an ideal
position to address the psychological factors in women who have had a
second trimester pregnancy loss.
The authors state that "awareness of the common and expected responses
to pregnancy loss can help the family physician in providing guidance
to these patients, who need information, reassurance, and
encouragement."
Michaels TC, Tiu AY. 2007. Second trimester pregnancy loss. American
Family Physician 76(9):1341-1346. Abstract available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/20071101/1341.html.
Readers: A handout on pregnancy loss, written by the authors of
this article, is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/20071101/1347ph.html.
More information is available from the following MCH Library resource:
- Preconception and Pregnancy (knowledge path) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html
************************************************************
4. LANCET SEMINAR EXAMINES SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME
"Further refinement in elucidation of the risk and protective factors,
with appropriately targeted and implemented interventions leading to
increased adoption by families, could bring the number of SIDS deaths
to lower and lower levels. However, the disorder is unlikely to be
completely eliminated or reduced to the lowest possible rates until the
specific causative mechanisms are understood more fully," state the
authors of an article published in the November 3, 2007, issue of The
Lancet. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is defined as "the sudden
death of an infant under one year of age, which remains unexplained
after a thorough case investigation, including performance of a
complete autopsy, examination of the death scene, and review of the
clinical history." Despite declines in SIDS rates following
risk-reduction campaigns, SIDS continues to be the leading cause of
death for infants ages 1 to 12 months in developed countries. The
article focuses on newer epidemiological and pathophysiological
findings on SIDS, risk-reduction recommendations, and controversies
related to some of these recommendations.
The article is based on searches of the PubMed database and of article
listings the authors received through various mailing lists. Citations
were selected from articles published in English. Most of the articles
selected had been published within the preceding 5 years, but the
authors did not exclude commonly referenced and highly regarded older
publications. Reference lists in key textbook chapters and review
articles were also checked.
Areas for future direction, as suggested by the authors' findings,
include the following:
- Research to identify the pathophysiology and genetics of SIDS
must be supported and expanded to include larger sample sizes of both
affected and control infants, and infants from the highest risk groups.
- Surveillance of trends in rates of SIDS and other sudden
unexpected infant deaths is crucial.
- Monitoring is needed of the adoption patterns of risk-reduction
recommendations among parents and health professionals and the effect
of these recommendations on SIDS rates and on other important outcomes,
such as breastfeeding. Established and proven measures, such as supine
sleeping for all infants (including those born preterm) and avoidance
of smoke exposure in utero, should continually be reinforced to new
generations of health professionals, parents, and others who care for
young children.
- Standardization of autopsy and scene-investigation protocols and
classification of deaths are essential pieces of the SIDS puzzle.
"The multifactorial, complex, and changing knowledge base and approach
to SIDS requires a multidisciplinary and collaborative effort that
engages health professionals and policymakers, researchers, medical
examiners and coroners, grief counsellors and agencies that provide
support to families, and above all, families and communities,
especially those at highest risk," the authors conclude.
Moon RY, Horne RSC, Hauck FR. 2007. Sudden infant death syndrome. The
Lancet 370(9598):1578-1587. Abstract available at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673607616626/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Infant Mortality (knowledge path) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
- Infant Mortality (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_infmortality.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_infmortality&-search
- Infant Mortality Prevention (organizations resource list) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_infmort.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_infmort&-search
************************************************************
5. AUTHORS EXPLORE DIFFERENCES IN MORTALITY BETWEEN LATE-PRETERM AND
TERM INFANTS
"In 2002 late-preterm infants were 3 times more likely than term
infants to die before their first birthday and 6 times more likely to
die in their first week of life; this disparity has remained relatively
unchanged since 1995," state the authors of an article published in the
November 2007 issue of the Journal of Pediatrics. The article examines
differences in U.S. mortality rates between singleton infants born
between 34 and 36 weeks' gestation (late preterm) and those born
between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation (term) by age at time of death. The
researchers also examine differences in the underlying causes of death
by age at death for these two groups of infants.
Data for the study were drawn from a period-linked birth and infant
death data file for the period 1995-2002, compiled by the National
Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Overall mortality rates by age at
time of death were calculated. Early neonatal deaths were defined as
infant deaths between 0 and 6 days of life; late-neonatal deaths were
those between 7 and 27 days; and post-neonatal deaths were those
between 28 and 364 days. Infant deaths were all deaths between 0 and
364 days of life. Infant deaths were assigned 1 of 71 rankable causes
as defined by NCHS. For the 10 leading causes of death in each
age-at-death category, the ratios between late-preterm and term
mortality rates were calculated.
The authors found that
- Overall mortality rates for both late-preterm and term infants
declined significantly from 1995 to 2002. Throughout the study period,
overall infant mortality rates were approximately three times higher
among late-preterm infants than among term infants.
- During infancy, late-preterm infants were approximately four
times more likely than term infants to die of newborn bacterial sepsis;
congenital malformations; and complications of placenta, cord, and
membranes.
- Between 1995 and 2002, rates of overall early neonatal mortality
declined significantly among both late-preterm infants and term
infants. Despite this decline, in 2002, late-preterm infants were still
nearly 6 times more likely than term infants to die during their first
week of life.
- In the age-at-death periods of interest, the early-neonatal
period had the most disparate cause-specific mortality rates.
Late-preterm infants were nearly 19 times more likely than term infants
to die of atelectasis (collapse of part or all of the lung), 10 times
more likely to die of maternal pregnancy complications, and 6 times
more likely to die of congenital malformations.
"Our study indicates that the greatest disparity in infant mortality
rates occurs during the first week of life," state the authors. They
conclude that "future research should assess the rationale for preterm
delivery," adding that "analysis of linked antenatal records will be
essential for assessing the extent to which these early-neonatal deaths
can be prevented."
Tomashek KM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Davidoff MJ, et al. 2007. Differences
in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the
United States, 1995–2002. The Journal of Pediatrics 450-456. Abstract
available at http://www.jpeds.com/article/PIIS0022347607004519/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Prematurity (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_premature.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_premature&-search
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2007 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/index.html
************************************************************