MCH Alert


Maternal and Child Health Library

This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.


October 12, 2007

1. Framework Combines Advances in Science and Program-Evaluation Research to Inform Early Childhood Policy Decisions
2. Study Examines Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Women
3. Authors Assess Mental Health Service Use Following a School-Based Suicide-Prevention Program
4. Article Documents Persistent Beneficial Effects of Breast Milk on Outcomes Among Infants with Extremely Low Birthweight

************************************************************

1. FRAMEWORK COMBINES ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND PROGRAM-EVALUATION RESEARCH TO INFORM EARLY CHILDHOOD POLICY DECISIONS

A Science-Based Framework for Early Childhood Policy: Using Evidence to Improve Outcomes in Learning, Behavior, and Health for Vulnerable Children combines scientific knowledge about early childhood and early brain development with findings from four decades of program evaluation research into a unified framework to guide policy decisions on behalf of young children and their families. The report, published by the Harvard University Center on the Developing Child, builds on a process of systematic analysis that began with the publication in 2000 of a landmark report by the National Academy of Sciences titled From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development, followed by the ongoing work of the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child and the National Forum on Early Childhood Program Evaluation, both of which are based at the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. The authors describe the process by which brain architecture is formed in very young children and integrate this scientific knowledge with the identification of factors from the program-evaluation literature that appear to offer the best course toward positive outcomes for children. Factors identified include the following: strengthening the family environment, serving children in out-of-home environments, combining support for vulnerable families with direct services for children, family economics and maternal employment, and the vulnerability of the young brain. An executive summary, references, and selected background readings are included. The report is available at http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu/content/downloads/Policy_Framework.pdf.

************************************************************

2. STUDY EXAMINES GESTATIONAL WEIGHT GAIN AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN OBESE WOMEN

"Our results showed similar trends for the effect of gestational weight gain on all four pregnancy outcomes analyzed in all three obese classes. However, the amount of gestational weight gain associated with minimal risk for all four outcomes collectively is different for each obesity class," state the authors of an article published in the October 2007 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Guidelines providing gestational weight gain ranges based on prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) were recommended by the Institute of Medicine to limit adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the guidelines for obese women do not provide an upper limit on gestational weight gain or distinguish between the different levels of obesity as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The article re-evaluates gestational weight gain guidelines for obese women by examining the relationship between gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in obese women using the NIH obesity classification system.

Data for the study were drawn from the Missouri linked birth-death certificate registry. The study population included all obese women residing in Missouri who delivered liveborn, singleton infants during 1990-2001 (N=120,251). Pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated from self-reported prepregnancy weight and height recorded on the birth certificate. According to NIH guidelines, obesity was defined as class I, II, and III. Gestational weight gain, abstracted from the mother's medical chart or provided by the physician, was divided into eight categories, as follows: 10 lb. or less loss, 2-9 lb. loss, no weight change, 2-9 lb. gain, 10-14 lb. gain, 15-25 lb. gain, 26-35 lb. gain, and greater than 35 lb. gain. The 15-25 lb. weight gain category was chosen as the referent group, per current guidelines. Outcomes analyzed included preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, small for gestational age (SGA) births, and large for gestational age (LGA) births. Potential confounders for the analysis included maternal age; race; education; poverty (based on enrollment in Medicaid, WIC, or food stamp programs); tobacco use; parity; and chronic hypertension. Within each obesity class, the absolute risk for each pregnancy outcome was computed and stratified by gestational weight gain category. The final analysis examined the association between gestational weight gain and the four pregnancy outcomes after adjusting for potential confounders.

The authors found that
"Our study suggests that appropriate gestational weight gain recommendations should be developed separately for each of the three NIH obesity classes, and an upper limit on gestational weight gain should be considered to prevent weight gain and comorbidities among obese women," the authors conclude.

Kiel DW, Dodson EA, Artal R, et al. 2007. Gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in obese women: How much is enough? Obstetrics and Gynecology 110(4):752-758. Abstract available at http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/short/110/4/752.

Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library resources:

- Preconception and Pregnancy (knowledge path) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html

- Nutrition During Pregnancy (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_pregnutr.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_pregnutr&-search

************************************************************

3. AUTHORS ASSESS MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE USE FOLLOWING A SCHOOL-BASED SUICIDE-PREVENTION PROGRAM

"We found that the majority of students identified by the LAUSD YSPP [Los Angeles Unified School District Youth Suicide Prevention Program] were referred to school or community mental health services and that more than half had subsequently received these services within several months of the crisis intervention," state the authors of an article published in the October 2007 issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. The article examines the impact of a gatekeeper program on subsequent referrals and treatment of suicidal students. Specifically, of those students identified by a school-based suicide-prevention program, the authors assess how many students subsequently received mental health services and what characteristics predict who gets this care.

The study was conducted as part of a 2001-2002 quality-improvement effort of the LAUSD YSPP, a school gatekeeper training model. School psychiatric social workers unfamiliar with the YSPP cases conducted 20-minute structured telephone interviews approximately 5 months following the initial YSPP contact. One hundred parents were randomly selected. Five parents declined participation, leaving a total sample of 95 subjects. Student characteristics (age, sex, grade, race and ethnicity) and types of crisis-intervention activities (referrals to inpatient and outpatient mental health services, referrals to group or individual counseling at school) were abstracted from the YSPP assessment form completed by school personnel at the time of the intervention. Parents provided information about whether their child received professional help for an emotional or behavioral problem from community mental health services or services from a school counselor or social worker. Interviewed parents completed the 11-item Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Predictive Scale (DPS) Depression module to assess depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behavior. Parents also provided information about their child's insurance status. Statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the sample of students who had received the YSPP intervention; examine the relationships between follow-up service use and the child demographic characteristics, crisis intervention services, parental perceived need, and history of suicide attempts; explore the relationships between service use and depressive symptoms; and assess what factors predicted community mental health service use at follow-up.

The authors found that
"Our findings suggest that school gatekeeper suicide prevention programs may be a promising way for schools to intervene with at-risk students, although further improvement in the actual implementation of these programs may be needed, especially in engaging and involving Latino parents and families in the process of follow-up care," conclude the authors.

Kataoka S, Stein BD, Nadeem E, et al. 2007. Who gets care? Mental health service use following a school-based suicide prevention program. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 46(10):1341-1348. Abstract available at http://www.jaacap.com/pt/re/jaacap/abstract.00004583-200710000-00013.htm;jsessionid=HTMRT61nJZG2gG4Pnyvhh6RHwwhvLFS1R9QT7kQyypTfLvnwwky9!1071114923!181195629!8091!-1.

Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library resources:

- Children and Adolescents with Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Challenges (knowledge path) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_Mental_Conditions.html

- Community Services Locator: Locating Community-Based Services to Support Children and Families (knowledge path) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_community.html

- Adolescent Mental Health (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_adolmenhlth.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_adolmenhlth&-search

- Child Mental Health (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_chldmenhlth.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_chldmenhlth&-search

- Culturally Competent Services (bibliography) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_cultcomp.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_cultcomp&-search

- School Health (selected resources) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/guides/schoolhealth.html

************************************************************

4. ARTICLE DOCUMENTS PERSISTENT BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF BREAST MILK ON OUTCOMES AMONG INFANTS WITH EXTREMELY LOW BIRTHWEIGHT

"On the basis of findings of persistent effects of BM [breast milk] on cognition . . . , efforts must be made to introduce all of the mothers to the benefits of BM," state the authors of an article published in the October 2007 issue of Pediatrics Electronic Pages. The authors previously reported beneficial effects of breast milk (BM) consumed in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) on development, behavior, and re-hospitalization rates at 18 months' corrected age (CA). The article presents findings from a study to determine whether BM ingestion in the NICU in the cohort of infants with ELBW would continue to be associated with higher developmental and behavior test scores and fewer re-hospitalizations at 30 months' corrected age (CA).

Subjects for the present study were derived from the original cohort of 1,433 infants who were enrolled in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Glutamine Trial between October 1999 and June 2001. Nutrition data, neonatal characteristics, and morbidities were prospectively collected, and 30-month follow-up assessments were completed on 773 infants with ELBW. The 30-month assessment included an interim medical history, a developmental evaluation, a neurologic assessment, and a physical examination including growth parameters. Social and economic status information, including maternal, paternal, and caretaker education and occupation; marital status; insurance status; and income level were also obtained. Infants were divided into quintiles of BM ingestion (milliliters per kilogram per day during hospitalization), adjusted for confounders, to identify threshold effects of BM (as compared with no BM) on neonatal and 30-month outcomes.

The authors found that
The findings suggest that "important effects of BM in this extremely preterm population occurred in the NICU," state the authors. They conclude that efforts to introduce mothers to the benefits of BM "should begin before pregnancy with supports after discharge from the birthing hospital."

Vohr BR, Poindexter BB, Dusick AM, et al. 2007. Persistent beneficial effects of breast milk ingested in the neonatal intensive care unit on outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants at 30 months of age. Pediatrics Electronic Pages 120(4):e953-e959. Abstract available at http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/120/4/e953?etoc.

Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library resource:

- Breastfeeding (selected resources) at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/guides/breastfeeding.html

************************************************************

To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

************************************************************

MCH Alert © 1998-2007 by National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement (U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal purposes.
 
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others. For all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.

The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions. Please contact us at the address below.

MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun

MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html

************************************************************