
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
June 22, 2007
1. Study Explores Coverage of Maternity Care Within
Consumer-Driven Health Plans
2. Research Brief Highlights Resident Fathers' Prenatal
Behaviors, Pregnancy Intentions, and Links to Involvement with Infants
3. Article Investigates Health Status, Health Behaviors,
and Health Conditions Among Amish Women
4. Authors Examine Associations Between Confidential
Services and Parent-Adolescent Communication
5. Article Looks into Risk Factors for Antepartum and
Intrapartum Stillbirth
************************************************************
1. STUDY EXPLORES COVERAGE OF MATERNITY CARE WITHIN CONSUMER-DRIVEN
HEALTH PLANS
Maternity Care and Consumer-Driven Health Plans examines the costs of
maternity care, the features of private health insurance affecting
maternity coverage, and the issues raised by a relatively new type of
health insurance called consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs). The
report, prepared by the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute
and the Kaiser Family Foundation, evaluates the level of insurance
protection CDHPs provide against the cost of maternity care and
presents estimates of likely care costs families will face using real
CDHPs sold in group and individual markets. Three different clinical
scenarios are examined -- an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, a Cesarean
section delivery, and a delivery with significant complications
-- to gauge different types of costs families may experience. An
executive summary, an introduction, a conclusion, endnotes, and
appendices are included. The report is available at http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/7636.cfm.
Readers: The report was released at a forum held on June 12, 2007,
which was co-sponsored by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the March of
Dimes. The forum agenda, speaker biographies, presentations, a Webcast
transcript, and related materials are available at http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/whp061207pkg.cfm.
************************************************************
2. RESEARCH BRIEF HIGHLIGHTS RESIDENT FATHERS' PRENATAL BEHAVIORS,
PREGNANCY INTENTIONS, AND LINKS TO INVOLVEMENT WITH INFANTS
Men's Pregnancy Intentions and Prenatal Behaviors: What They Mean for
Fathers' Involvement with Their Children examines how men feel about a
pregnancy (pregnancy intentions), how men act during the pregnancy
(prenatal behaviors), and the effects of these intentions and behaviors
on men's involvement with very young children following birth. The
research brief, published by Child Trends, draws on data from the 2001
Early Childhood Longitudinal Study -- Birth Cohort, 9-month Resident
Father Survey, which tracks a nationally representative sample of
children from infancy to first grade. The brief includes a summary, a
discussion of the implications for policy and practice, and a
conclusion. References and statistical charts and graphs are also
included. The brief is available at http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2007_05_31_RB_Prenatal.pdf.
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE INVESTIGATES HEALTH STATUS, HEALTH BEHAVIORS, AND HEALTH
CONDITIONS AMONG AMISH WOMEN
"We believe our work is among the first systematic, population-based
surveys of women in Amish culture beyond educated conjecture,
first-person accounts, and clinic-based surveys," write the authors of
an article published in the May 2007 issue of Women’s Health Issues.
There is little evidence-based research on Amish health care, Amish
women, and childbirth among the Amish. This study reports the results
of a survey of the demographics, behaviors, and exposures of 288
randomly selected Amish women of childbearing age residing in Lancaster
County, PA. The authors compare their findings with those of a
concurrent survey of 2,002 women in Central Pennsylvania generally.
Data for the study came from a household survey of Amish women of
childbearing age (ages 18-45) living in Lancaster County between
November 2004 and June 2005. The purpose of the survey was to estimate
the prevalence of behaviors and exposures that may lead to adverse
pregnancy outcomes. The survey instrument consisted of questions on
sociodemographics, health status, health habits, health care access,
stress and exposures, and pregnancy and childbirth.
The authors found that
- Among the Amish women, 81.3% had been pregnant at least once, and
80.2% had at least one live birth. At the time of the survey, 36% were
pregnant. Among the general population, 72.1% had been pregnant at
least once, and 68.4% had at least one live birth. At the time of the
survey, 3.9% were pregnant.
- Amish women rated their physical health at approximately the same
level as women in the general population but rated their mental health
at higher levels.
- Amish women had a lower body mass index than women in the general
population. Amish women were less likely to engage in physical exercise
other than work, were more likely to perceive themselves as being at an
appropriate weight, and were less likely to be trying to lose weight,
compared with women in the general population.
- Intimate partner violence was reported by 0.7% of Amish women,
compared with 7.0% of women in the general population.
- Amish women reported a mean of 11.6 people to whom they can turn
to for support, compared with 7.0 people among women in the general
population.
- Among the Amish women who had at least one live birth, there were
fewer preterm births, compared to women in the general population with
at least one live birth, but about the same percentage of preterm
births.
The authors conclude that "the Amish may help us understand the
interaction between socioeconomic status and lifestyle variables on
birth outcomes."
Miller K, Yost B, Flaherty S, et al. 2007. Health status, health
conditions, and health behaviors among Amish women: Results from the
Central Pennsylvania Women’s Health Study (CePAWHS). Women’s Health
Issues 17(3):162-171. Available at http://www.whijournal.com/article/PIIS1049386707000369/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's
bibliography, Women's Health, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_womengen.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_womengen&-search.
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS EXAMINE ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN CONFIDENTIAL SERVICES AND
PARENT-ADOLESCENT COMMUNICATION
"This study supports the hypothesis that availability of services is
not a barrier to adolescent-parent communication about their health,"
state the authors of an article published in the June 2007 issue of the
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Questions remain about
the relationship between access to confidential services and whether
adolescents communicate with their parents regarding their health care.
The article describes a study to examine whether the availability of
confidential services was a barrier to adolescents' communication with
their parents about heath issues. The researchers also evaluated
whether adolescents' comfort with discussing reproductive health issues
would impact future communication with parents about potentially
serious and sensitive reproductive health care issues.
The study sample included 59 adolescents (ages 15-21) from an urban
adolescent health clinic in Minnesota who agreed to participate and
completed an anonymous survey. Females comprised 88% (N=50) of the
study sample; 70% (N=35) of the adolescents were 16 and older; 23%
(N=13) of the adolescents reported their race as white, 37% (N=21) as
African American, and 40% (N=25) as other; 87% (N=52) of the
adolescents attended school; and 43% (N=23) of the adolescents reported
qualifying for free or reduced-price school lunch. The analysis
examined the frequency of adolescents seeking confidential services and
non-confidential services. Outcome variables included communication
with parents about clinic visit and health concerns and comfort with
discussing reproductive health care issues with their parents.
The authors found that
- Fifty-eight percent of the adolescents came to the clinic for
confidential services.
- Overall, 69.5% (N=41) of the adolescents told their parents they
were coming to the clinic.
- Less than half (43.1%, N=25) of the adolescents reported that
they would tell their parents if they were found to have a serious and
sensitive reproductive health problem (sexually transmitted infection
or pregnancy). Of those who would tell their parents, approximately
half had come in for confidential services and half for
non-confidential services.
- In terms of adolescents' decisions about whether to discuss their
reasons for coming to the clinic and their future communication related
to serious and sensitive reproductive health care issues with their
parents, there was no significant difference between adolescents who
came in for confidential vs. non-confidential services.
The authors suggest that further research is needed to explore health
professionals' role in helping adolescents share information about a
serious and sensitive reproductive health problem and assisting them in
obtaining support from their parents. The authors add that
interventions need to be in place to educate parents about
communication with their adolescent and the rights of their adolescent
under the minor's consent laws.
Lerand SJ, Ireland M, Boutelle K. 2007. Communication with our teens:
Associations between confidential service and parent-teen
communication. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
20():173-178. Abstract available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W68-4NXH6RM-7&_user=10&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2007&_rdoc=7&_fmt=summary&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%236592%232007%23999799996%23660502%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=6592&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=16&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a6c2471d6f4deaceef2bbbf01a3c6937.
Readers: More information is available from the Bright Futures Web site
at http://www.BrightFutures.org
and from the MCH Library's bibliographies, Culturally Competent
Services, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_cultcomp.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_cultcomp&-search,
and Sexuality Education, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_sexeduc.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_sexeduc&-search
and organizations resource list, Adolescent Pregnancy and
Parents, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_adolpregpar.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_adolpregpar&-search.
************************************************************
5. ARTICLE LOOKS INTO RISK FACTORS FOR ANTEPARTUM AND INTRAPARTUM
STILLBIRTH
"The study reveals considerable heterogeneity in risk factors between
antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths," state the authors of an
article published in the June 2007 issue of the American Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology. Relatively little is known about racial
disparities in risk factors for overall stillbirth or about differences
in stillbirths that occur during the antepartum vs. the intrapartum
period. The article examines race-specific stillbirth risks and the
timing (antepartum vs. intrapartum) of stillbirth among singleton
pregnancies.
The sample for the population-based, cross-sectional study included
women that delivered singleton births in Missouri during the period
1989-1997 (N=626,883). Factors that were considered to be associated
with stillbirth included maternal sociodemographic characteristics,
behavioral factors, medical history, obstetrical complications, and
fetal outcomes. Self-reported maternal race was grouped as either white
or African American. Principal outcome variables were antepartum
stillbirth (the death of a fetus before the onset of labor) and
intrapartum stillbirth (the death of a fetus during labor and delivery)
between 20 and 43 weeks of gestation. The analysis examined the impact
of risk factors on stillbirth.
The authors found that
- Rates of antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth among African
Americans were 5.6 and 1.1 per 1,000 births, respectively;
corresponding rates among whites were 3.4 and 0.5 per 1,000 births,
respectively.
- Advanced maternal age, late initiation of prenatal care or no
prenatal care, being overweight or obese, and prior preterm or
small-for-gestational-age births were significantly associated with
increased risk for antepartum stillbirth among whites but not among
African Americans.
- Being underweight was associated with risk for antepartum and
intrapartum stillbirth among African Americans but not among whites.
- Congenital anomaly, placental abruption, and cord complications
were significantly associated with antepartum stillbirth among both
whites and African Americans.
- Premature rupture of the membranes was significantly associated
with intrapartum stillbirth among both whites and African Americans.
- Approximately 45% and 80% of antepartum and intrapartum
stillbirth cases, respectively, among African Americans, and 53% and
88% of antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth cases, respectively, among
whites remained unexplained by the risk factors.
- The hazard ratio for antepartum stillbirth was lower among
African Americans compared with whites at preterm gestational ages with
cross-over in risk at term gestation.
"Knowledge on timing of stillbirth specific risk factors may help
clinicians in decreasing antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth risks
through monitoring and timely interventions," conclude the authors.
Getahun D, Ananth CV, Kinzler WL. 2007. Risk factors for antepartum and
intrapartum stillbirth: A population-based study. American Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology 137(11):117-1189. Abstract available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/137/11/1177.
Readers: More information about racial and ethnic disparities in health
is available from the MCH Library's knowledge path at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_race.html
and bibliography at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_racedispar.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_racedispar&-search.
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2007 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************