
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
March 9, 2007
1. Paper Discusses Health Plan Approaches to Address
Child Health Disparities
2. Survey Compiles Information on Child Nutrition and
Physical Activity Programs
3. Journal Supplement Documents History and Evidence Base
for Normal Birth
4. Analysis of Vital Statistics Data Highlights
Disparities in Fetal and Perinatal Mortality
5. Authors Compare Maternal Outcomes Associated with
Planned Cesarean and Planned Vaginal Births
************************************************************
1. PAPER DISCUSSES HEALTH PLAN APPROACHES TO ADDRESS CHILD HEALTH
DISPARITIES
Reducing Health Disparities Among Children: Strategies And Programs
reviews what is known about health disparities among children and
explores strategies for addressing these disparities. The issue paper,
produced by the National Institute for Health Care Management
Foundation, provides a brief overview of health disparities, including
the importance of health insurance to address them, as well as its
limitation in doing so. The overview is followed by a description of
innovative approaches (data collection, provider education, treatment
and prevention, community focused) by health plans to reduce
disparities and ensure cultural competence. A framework of factors
affecting health and well-being; data on the self-reported health
status of children by income and parental education level, average
annual physician visits among children by health status, percentage of
children ever told that they had asthma, and percentage of children who
are overweight; and a list of selected resources on maternal and child
health disparities are included. The paper is intended to inform
policymakers, health professionals, families, and others about the
roots of health disparities and the current state of health disparities
among children. The paper is available at http://www.nihcm.org/finalweb/HealthDisparitiesFinal.pdf.
************************************************************
2. SURVEY COMPILES INFORMATION ON CHILD NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
PROGRAMS
The Shaping America's Youth (SAY) Survey collects information about
populations, methods, funding, and outcomes from organizations and
programs working in areas related to childhood overweight. The online
survey is part of the SAY national cross-sector initiative directed at
improving nutrition and exercise in America's children. Survey
information is made available in a searchable national program registry
on the SAY Web site. The SAY survey and registry are intended for use
by health professionals and others in identifying best practices and
promoting a common dialogue to address overweight, poor nutrition, and
physical inactivity in children. The survey, program registry, and an
array of other childhood overweight and obesity information and
resources are available at http://www.shapingamericasyouth.org.
************************************************************
3. JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT DOCUMENTS HISTORY AND EVIDENCE BASE FOR NORMAL
BIRTH
The Winter 2007 supplement to the Journal of Perinatal Education
describes the history of the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
as part of a global effort to promote "normal birth" (as established by
universal guidelines for the routine care of women during uncomplicated
labor and childbirth). The supplement presents the principles
underlying the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative (MFCI), the first
consensus declaration in the history of North America in which a
multidisciplinary body of professional organizations and individuals
address the issues of labor and birth. The supplement also identifies
the Ten Steps of Mother-Friendly Care that lay out the practical
application of the philosophy and principles of the MFCI and introduce
the evidence base for the Ten Steps. Discussion and commentary are
provided. The supplement is intended for use by health professionals,
families, and others in supporting normal birth and breastfeeding as
the standard of care for all women. The supplement is available to
journal subscribers at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/lamaze/jpe.
************************************************************
4. ANALYSIS OF VITAL STATISTICS DATA HIGHLIGHTS DISPARITIES IN FETAL
AND PERINATAL MORTALITY
Fetal and Perinatal Mortality, United States, 2003 presents detailed
data on fetal and perinatal deaths and mortality rates for the United
States for 2003. For the purposes of the report, published by the
National Center for Health Statistics, fetal mortality refers to the
intrauterine death of a fetus at any gestational age, and perinatal
mortality refers to death around the time of delivery and includes both
fetal deaths (at least 20 weeks of gestation) and early infant
(neonatal) deaths. The authors examine data from the 2003 fetal death
data file and the 2003 period linked birth and infant death data file
by a variety of characteristics, including race and Hispanic origin,
maternal age, marital status, sex of fetus, plurality (multiple
deliveries), birthweight, and period of gestation. Fetal and perinatal
mortality rates by state are provided. A discussion, references, a list
of detailed tables, and technical notes are also included. The report
is available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr55/nvsr55_06.pdf.
************************************************************
5. AUTHORS COMPARE MATERNAL OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH PLANNED CESAREAN
AND PLANNED VAGINAL BIRTHS
Our study found "a small, but consistent growth in planned primary
cesareans, but higher costs, longer hospital stays, and substantially
greater risks of maternal rehospitalization associated with these
deliveries," state the authors of an article published in the March
2007 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The March 2006 National
Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Conference report
concluded that there was a need for research that explicitly compared
outcomes of planned cesarean delivery with outcomes of planned vaginal
delivery. The article examines 6 years of data from a population-based
linked data system to create a refined measure identifying women with
planned cesareans and planned vaginal births and comparing maternal
outcomes and costs associated with these two options.
Data for the analyses were drawn from the Pregnancy to Early Life
Longitudinal Data System, a public-private partnership among Boston
University's School of Public Health, the Massachusetts Department of
Public Health, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Birth certificates were linked to the infant's hospital discharge
records for the birth event, and birth and fetal death certificate
records were linked to the mother's delivery record. Subsequent
maternal hospitalizations were identified by linking birth-event data
longitudinally to maternal hospitalizations in Massachusetts hospitals
in the year after the birth. Cases in which a woman gave birth a second
time within a year of the index birth were excluded. The study sample
included women who had not had a prior cesarean birth and who had a
singleton, full term birth, with "no documented prior risk." Women were
classified, in conformance with NIH-recommended guidelines, as planned
cesarean births (primary cesareans with no labor and no documented
complications; N=3,334) or planned vaginal births (vaginal or cesarean
births with labor). The planned vaginal group consisted of vaginal
births with no documented labor complications (N=172,329), vaginal
births with documented labor complications (N=47,509), and primary
cesarean births with documented labor complications (N=20,916). The
analyses examined rates of maternal hospital re-admission to any
Massachusetts hospital, as well as unadjusted and adjusted odds rations
for re-admission, during three time periods after discharge for the
birth: 1-30 days, 31-180 days, and 181-365 days. Costs of initial and
subsequent hospitalizations were also calculated, including average
costs by method of delivery controlling for age, parity, race or
ethnicity, and payer source. Women's length of hospital stay was also
examined.
The authors found that
- The rate of re-admission to a hospital (per 1,000) within 1 month
of delivery for planned vaginal births was significantly lower than
that for planned primary cesarean births (7.5 vs. 19.2). Adjusting for
age, race or ethnicity, and parity, a woman who had a planned primary
cesarean birth was 2.3 times as likely as a woman who had a planned
vaginal birth to be re-admitted in the first month after the birth.
- The leading reason for re-admission associated with planned
primary cesarean births in the first 30 days after birth was surgical
wound complications. Postpartum infections were a major cause of
re-admission for both groups, with the rate of re-admission for
infection after planned primary cesarean births almost twice as high as
that of infection after planned vaginal births.
- The average initial maternal (excluding infant) hospital costs in
2003 dollars for a planned primary cesarean birth were 76% higher than
the average initial costs for a planned vaginal birth ($4,372 vs.
$2,487).
- Women who had a planned primary cesarean birth averaged 4.3 days
in their initial stay and 4.4 days in cases of re-admission, compared
with 2.4 and 3.9 days, respectively, for those with a planned vaginal
birth.
- Costs associated with a planned primary cesarean birth, compared
with costs associated with a planned vaginal birth, were higher for
both delivery (65%) and postpartum re-admission (11%).
"Our findings suggest that planned primary cesareans are not without
immediate health consequences for mothers and financial implications
for society," state the authors. They conclude that "clinicians should
be aware of the increased risk for maternal rehospitalization after
cesarean deliveries to low-risk mothers when counseling women about
their choices."
Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, et al. 2007. Maternal outcomes
associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned
vaginal births. Obstetrics and Gynecology 109(3):669-677. Abstract
available at http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/109/3/669?etoc.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's knowledge
path, Preconception Care and Pregnancy, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html;
from the bibliography, Prenatal Care, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_prenatal.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_prenatal&-search;
and from the organizations resource lists, Maternal Morbidity and
Mortality, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_matmort.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_matmort&-search
and Prenatal Care, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_prenat.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_prenat&-search.
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2006 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************