
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html.
January 26, 2007
1. Intervention Kit Developed to Help Health
Professionals Prevent Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
2. Report Tracks State Progress in Developing
Comprehensive Strategies and Tactics Toward Eliminating Cervical Cancer
3. Article Highlights Lessons from States on SCHIP
Enrollment Caps
4. Authors Assess the Contribution of Abstinence and
Improved Contraceptive Use to Recent Declines in Adolescent Pregnancy
************************************************************
1. INTERVENTION KIT DEVELOPED TO HELP HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PREVENT
FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS
Drinking and Reproductive Health: A Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Prevention Tool Kit presents strategies to help health professionals
identify women who drink at risky levels and engage them in changing
behavior to reduce their risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy. The
continuing education activity, sponsored by the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists with support from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, is designed to help health
professionals who care for women prevent fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders (FASD) when they encounter risky drinking, regardless of the
woman's pregnancy status. A brief guide provides information on FASD,
screening and intervention guidelines, frequently asked questions, a
blueprint for putting screening and intervention into practice, the
Surgeon General's Advisory on Alcohol Use in Pregnancy, resources, and
references. Other materials include handouts for patients about
drinking and reproductive health, additional screening tools and
counseling tips for health professionals, and a pocket card
illustrating standard-sized drinks. More information is available at http://www.acog.org/from_home/misc/dept_pubs.cfm.
************************************************************
2. REPORT TRACKS STATE PROGRESS IN DEVELOPING COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIES
AND TACTICS TOWARD ELIMINATING CERVICAL CANCER
Partnering for Progress 2007: The "State" of Cervical Cancer Prevention
in America shows how states are working with community stakeholders in
their efforts to eliminate cervical cancer and tracks each state's
performance in making cervical-cancer prevention a top priority. The
report is the third in a series of annual reports published by Women in
Government for the Challenge to Eliminate Cervical Cancer Campaign. The
campaign is designed to educate state legislators about cervical cancer
and the human papilloma virus and to advocate for education and access
to the most advanced and appropriate screening and preventive
technologies available. The campaign's 2007 report tracks state-level
cervical cancer incidence and mortality data, insurance coverage,
screening rates and coverage of advanced screening technologies, and
policy initiatives. Contents include an introduction, findings,
recommended actions, case studies, and cervical-cancer-prevention
facts. A state score comparison chart and methodology information are
included as appendices. The executive summary is available at http://www.womeningovernment.org/prevention/statereport/PDF/ExecutiveSummary.pdf.
The full report is available at http://www.womeningovernment.org/prevention/statereport/PDF/WIG%202007%20report.pdf.
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS LESSONS FROM STATES ON SCHIP ENROLLMENT CAPS
"[State Children's Health Insurance Program] enrollment caps resulted
in quick cost savings and, largely because of this, were lifted by the
states relatively quickly," state the authors of an article published
in the January-February 2007 issue of Health Affairs. In response to a
national recession, struggling state and local economies, and increased
public spending demands, most states have trimmed a broad range of
programs, including the State Children's Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP). The article presents the experiences of 7 of the 39 states
with separate (as opposed to Medicaid expansion) programs that capped
enrollment during the 2001-2003 recession.
The study was conducted as part of an evaluation of the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation's Covering Kids and Families (CKF) initiative to
support outreach, simplification, and coordination activities in
child-enrollment efforts in more than 140 community-based projects in
45 states and the District of Columbia. Telephone interviews were
conducted in October and November 2004 with SCHIP and CKF grant
directors in each of the seven states that enacted enrollment caps
(Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Montana, North Carolina, and
Utah). Informants were asked to discuss the factors that led to the
enactment and lifting of caps, policies that were adopted to manage
implementation, caps' impact on SCHIP enrollment and other aspects of
the program, and strategies to mitigate caps' negative effects. The
existing literature on enrollment caps was reviewed, and administrative
data were obtained to document enrollment trends.
The authors found that
- Three states enacted enrollment caps in 2001 at the outset of the
recession; four states capped enrollment between July and November 2003
at the height of the recession.
- With the exception of Montana, all states lifted their enrollment
caps within 1 year of enactment.
- While caps were in place, total enrollment dropped by an
aggregate 15% in the six states that capped and then reopened
enrollment. Rates of attrition ranged from 6% in Florida and Maryland
to 29% in North Carolina.
- Only simplified renewal was observed to reduce rates of
enrollment attrition; neither maintaining a waiting list nor modifying
cost-sharing policies had an effect on enrollment attrition or recovery.
- Informants described their reluctance to conduct outreach while
programs were capped. However, agencies adjusted messages and
strategies to emphasize renewal or applications for Medicaid. States
and CKF grantees were eager to promote coverage once caps were lifted.
- Enrollment caps caused confusion for parents (e.g., fear that
SCHIP had been entirely closed was widespread). However, rapid
enrollment recovery in most states after caps were lifted and during
open periods suggests that SCHIP still represents a needed and
desirable product to parents.
- Rates of retention among SCHIP enrollees improved during and
after caps.
The authors conclude that "perhaps the lessons learned by the states
studied here can help others design policies that minimize the negative
impacts on vulnerable children."
Hill I, Courtot B, Sullivan J. 2007. Coping with SCHIP enrollment caps:
Lessons from seven states' experiences. Health Affairs 26(1):258-268.
Abstract available at http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/1/258?etoc.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's knowledge
path, Child and Adolescent Health Insurance and Access to Care, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_insurance.html
and from the bibliography, Child Health Insurance, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_chldhlthins.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_chldhlthins&-search.
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS ASSESS THE CONTRIBUTION OF ABSTINENCE AND IMPROVED
CONTRACEPTIVE USE TO RECENT DECLINES IN ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY
"Our data suggest that declining adolescent pregnancy rates in the
United States between 1995 and 2002 were primarily attributable to
improved contraception use," state the authors of an article published
in the January 2007 issue of the American Journal of Public Health.
Adolescent pregnancy rates in the United States declined by 27% from
1991 to 2000. In a previous analysis of nationally representative data
from samples of U.S. high-school students, the authors of the article
found significant increases in use of contraception among adolescents
ages 15-17 between 1991 and 2001 and estimated that improved
contraceptive use and delay in initiation of intercourse contributed
equally to declining pregnancy rates. The article presents findings
from an effort to update the study using data from the National Survey
of Family Growth (NSFG), a nationally representative household survey
that, relative to school surveys, provides more data on older
adolescents and those who have left school and collects more detailed
information about contraceptive use. The current analysis examined the
roles of increased contraceptive use and delayed initiation of sexual
activity in explaining changes in pregnancy risk over the period
1995-2002 among adolescents ages 15-19.
Measures for the analysis included sexual activity and contraceptive
use, contraceptive failure rates, risk indices, and data on
pregnancies. The two risk indices created for the study included (1)
the contraceptive risk index, which summarized the overall
effectiveness of a group's contraceptive use and nonuse and (2) the
overall pregnancy risk index, which summarized the risk of pregnancy
among all adolescents, incorporating information about both the level
of recent sexual activity and the level of contraceptive risk among
those who were sexually active at the time of the study.
The authors found that
- Rates of sexual activity did not decline significantly among
adolescents ages 15-19 or among those ages 18-19; the decline in sexual
activity among adolescents ages 15-17 was of borderline significance.
- The contraceptive risk index declined by 34% among adolescents
ages 15-19, by 46% among those ages 15-17, and by 27% among those ages
18-19.
- Pregnancy risk declined by 38% among adolescents ages 15-19, by
55% among those ages 15-17, and by 27% among those ages 18-19.
- Fourteen percent of the change in pregnancy risk among
adolescents ages 15-19 was attributable to a decrease in the percentage
of sexually active young women, while 86% was attributable to changes
in contraceptive method use; among adolescents ages 15-17, the
corresponding percentages were 23% and 77%, respectively. All of the
change in pregnancy risk among adolescents ages 18-19 was the result of
increased contraceptive use.
"In comparison with our school-based study, this analysis of the NSFG
showed a larger contribution of contraceptive use to declines in
adolescent pregnancy rates," state the authors. They add, "our findings
raise questions about current US government policies that promote
abstinence from sexual activity as the primary strategy to prevent
adolescent pregnancy."
Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Finer LB, et al. 2007. Explaining recent
declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: The contribution
of abstinence and improved contraceptive use. American Journal of
Public Health 97(1):150-156. Abstract available at http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/97/1/150?etoc.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's knowledge
path, Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_adolpreg.html,
from the bibliography, Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Biblio&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/BibLists/bib_adolpregprev.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_adolpregprev&-search,
and from the organizations resource list, Adolescent Pregnancy and
Parents, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database=Organizations&-layout=Web&-response=/databases/OrgLists/orgs_adolpregpar.html&-MaxRecords=all&-DoScript=auto_search_adolpregpar&-search.
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to
MCHAlert-request@list.ncemch.org
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2006 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to
mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/default.html
************************************************************