
National
Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Search past issues of
the MCH Alert and other MCH Library resources at http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/search.lasso
March 26, 2004
1. Working Group Presents
Recommendations on FDA's Role and Responsibilities in Addressing Obesity
2. Public Health/Juvenile Justice
Partnership Examines Suicide Among Children and Adolescents
3. Effectiveness of School-Based
Suicide-Prevention Program Evaluated
4. Authors Discuss How Medicaid
Managed Care Has Evolved in Local Markets
5. Language Barriers to Health Care Access for Children
with Special Health Care Needs Assessed
************************************************************
1. WORKING GROUP
PRESENTS RECOMMENDATIONS ON FDA'S ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN
ADDRESSING OBESITY
Calories Count: Report of the Working Group on Obesity outlines an
action plan to confront the nation's obesity epidemic and help
consumers lead healthier lives through better nutrition. The report was
prepared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Obesity
Working Group (OWG) and represents the FDA's role and responsibilities
in addressing obesity. To accomplish its goals, the OWG met eight times
from August 28, 2003, to January 22, 2004; held one public meeting, one
workshop, and two roundtable discussions (one with health professionals
and academicians, and one with representatives of consumer groups); and
solicited comments on obesity-related issues. The short- and long-term
recommendations contained in the report are based on the scientific
fact that weight control is achieved mainly by balancing caloric intake
and energy expenditure. The recommendations, which emphasize the
importance of considering consumer and other stakeholder views and
needs in addressing obesity, include the underlying rationale for food
labeling, enforcement activities, educational partnerships,
therapeutics, and research. More information about the report is
available at http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/obesity.
************************************************************
2. PUBLIC HEALTH/JUVENILE
JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP EXAMINES SUICIDE AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
Juvenile Suicides, 1981-1998 examines trends and characteristics of
suicides committed by children and adolescents in the United States.
The report appears in the March 2004 issue of the Youth Violence
Research Bulletin, a series published by the Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. The
authors analyzed data on suicides and deaths among children and
adolescents ages 7-17. The data were drawn from the National Vital
Statistics System and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the
period 1981-1998. The report includes information on suicide rates and
suicide/homicide ratios by state, gender, race/ethnicity, and age. The
report also includes information about the percentage of firearm- and
non-firearm-related suicides. The report is intended for use by
practitioners, service providers, parents, and policymakers in focusing
attention on a critical topic related to child and adolescent violence.
It is available at http://ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/196978/contents.html or at http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196978.pdf.
************************************************************
3. EFFECTIVENESS OF
SCHOOL-BASED SUICIDE-PREVENTION PROGRAM EVALUATED
"It is clear . . . that the SOS [Signs of Suicide] suicide prevention
program has a substantively important short-term impact on the
attitudes and behaviors of high school-aged youths in high-risk
settings," state the authors of an article published in the March 2004
issue of the American Journal of Public Health. The authors state that
suicide among young people is one of the most serious public health
problems in the United States, and that, while a number of approaches
to suicide prevention have been incorporated into high school curricula
during the past 15 years, few have been subject to rigorous evaluation,
and those that have been evaluated have produced mixed results. The
purpose of the study described in this article was to assess the
short-term impact of the school-based SOS program on suicidal behavior,
seeking help, and knowledge of and attitudes toward depression and
suicide in a diverse student population.
The study population consisted of 2,100 public high school students in
three high schools in Hartford, CT, and Columbus, GA. The schools
provided a racially mixed and economically diverse sample of students.
Students were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups.
Students in both groups completed a questionnaire approximately 3
months after implementation of the program.
The authors found that
- Students in the
treatment group were approximately 40% less likely to report a suicide
attempt in the past 3 months, compared with students in the control
group.
- Students in the
treatment group had greater knowledge of depression and suicide and
more adaptive attitudes toward these problems, compared with students
in the control group.
- The effects of the
SOS program on help-seeking behavior did not achieve statistical
significance.
- Although descriptive
statistics indicated lower levels of suicidal ideation among the
treatment group, compared with the control group, theses differences
fell short of statistical significance.
- Girls, compared with
boys, had significantly greater knowledge and more constructive
attitudes about depression and suicide, were more likely to seek help
when depressed and to intervene on behalf of friends, and were
significantly more likely to report suicidal ideation and suicide
attempts in the past 3 months.
- Students in English
as a Second Language (ESL) programs had less accurate knowledge about
depression and suicide and a higher prevalence of self-reported suicide
attempts, compared with students not in these programs. However, ESL
status was positively related to seeking help.
- White students were
more knowledgeable about depression and suicide, compared with those in
other racial and ethnic categories. However, black students reported
lower rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts than did white or
Hispanic students and were less likely to seek help for these problems.
The authors conclude that "this is the first school-based suicide
prevention program for which a reduction in self-reported suicide
attempts has been documented with a randomized experimental design."
Aseltine RH, DeMartino R. 2004. An outcome evaluation of the SOS
suicide prevention program. American Journal of Public Health
94(3):446-451.
Readers: More information is available from the Bright Futures Web site
at http://www.brightfutures.org/mentalhealth/index.html and from the MCH Library's knowledge path, Adolescent Violence
Prevention, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_adolvio.html;
from the bibliography, Adolescent Mental Health, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/bibmenu.html;
and from the organizations resource list, Adolescent Violence
Prevention, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/orgmenu.html.
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS DISCUSS HOW
MEDICAID MANAGED CARE HAS EVOLVED IN LOCAL MARKETS
"In today's context of a changing managed care marketplace and tight
budgets, states face major challenges in operating Medicaid managed
care programs," state the authors of an article published in the
March/April 2004 issue of Health Affairs. The article presents an
analysis of data collected since 1996 from a nationally representative
sample of Medicaid managed care markets to describe how Medicaid
managed care is evolving in local U.S. markets and the implications of
this evolution for policymakers.
Data for the analysis was drawn from the Community Tracking Study
(CTS), a longitudinal study conducted by the Center for Studying Health
Systems Change, which uses multiple data sources to examine changes in
local health care systems. The authors relied on data collected in
structured interviews with leaders of plans that participate in
Medicaid, policymakers, providers, and other relevant Medicaid
stakeholders in the 12 CTS markets (AZ, AR, CA, FL, IN, MA, MI, NJ, NY,
OH, SC, and WA).
The authors found that
- Since 1996, there has
been a 30 percent decrease in the number of plans that participate in
Medicaid, with the most dramatic decrease in the number of
participating commercial plans.
- The number of
participating plans that are Medicaid-focused has remained relatively
stable since 1996; these plans have expanded their memberships as
Medicaid enrollment has grown and have strengthened their hold on this
line of business as other types of plans exit.
- For-profit, publicly
traded health insurance companies that specialize in Medicaid are fast
becoming major players in states' programs.
- Provider (often
safety-net provider) sponsorship of plans that participate in Medicaid
remains strong, even though this type of sponsorship has declined in
other sectors.
- Cost-sharing options
are more limited in Medicaid than in the commercial insurance sector,
where cost sharing is actively used to encourage consumers to use fewer
services or to take a more active decision-making role in service use
and product choice.
- Plans participating
in Medicaid managed care rely extensively on traditional
utilization-management tools, including primary care gatekeeping, prior
authorization, and concurrent review. This is in sharp contrast to the
commercial sector, where there has been extensive movement away from
restrictive product designs in recent years.
- Compared with
commercial networks that have become broad and inclusive, Medicaid
participating plans reported narrower networks for their Medicaid
products (i.e., provider sponsors or traditional Medicaid providers
such as community health centers).
"Today's Medicaid managed care is different from most commercial
managed care in a number of different ways," state the authors. They
conclude that "in states' Medicaid programs, cost control is key, a
factor that states find more compatible with the underlying theory of
managed care -- some restrictions on care in return for reasonable
access and comprehensive benefits at a fairly predictable cost."
Draper DA, Hurley RE, Short AC. 2004. Medicaid managed care: The last
bastion of the HMO? Health Affairs 23(2):155-167.
************************************************************
5. LANGUAGE BARRIERS TO
HEALTH CARE ACCESS FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS ASSESSED
The study findings "illustrate the substantial effect that language can
have on families of children whose needs for health care are greatest,"
state the authors of an article published in the March-April 2004 issue
of Ambulatory Pediatrics. The article describes a study designed to (1)
assess the prevalence of selected health care access characteristics by
the language of interview, (2) isolate the effect of language on
access, and (3) demonstrate the effect of language on access among
Hispanic children with special health care needs (CSHCN).
Data for the study were drawn from the 2001 National Survey of Children
with Special Health Care Needs, sponsored by the Maternal and Child
Health Bureau and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
NCHS conducted the survey using the State and Local Area Integrated
Telephone Survey mechanism to collect information on the child's health
and functional status, access to care, insurance coverage, and
demographic and financial information. Those who participated in an
English interview were classified as English-speaking respondents. Of
the 38,866 interviews completed for CSHCN, 38,011 were conducted in
English and 855 were conducted in other languages. Researchers assessed
(1) characteristics of the CSHCN population as a whole and by
respondent language and (2) the relationship between barriers to access
and respondent language. The analyses controlled for the child's age,
gender, race or ethnicity, poverty level, insurance status, impact of
condition, maternal education, and region of residence.
The authors found that
- Children with
non-English-speaking parents were significantly more likely to be from
families with less education and lower incomes, compared with children
with English-speaking parents; the former were more likely to lack
health insurance and to have conditions that more dramatically impacted
their activities. Children with non-English-speaking parents were also
more likely to be younger and to be of Hispanic or Asian descent.
- Children with
non-English-speaking parents were more likely to experience barriers to
access and to face challenges to obtaining quality care. The most
prevalent barrier to access was inadequate health insurance, which was
reported by 86.5% of non-English-speaking parents and 33.1% of
English-speaking parents.
- CSHCN with
non-English-speaking parents were significantly more likely to
experience barriers to access and adverse consequences based on their
special needs. These children were 11 times more likely than those with
English-speaking parents to have inadequate health insurance and were
more likely to have an unmet need for family support services, to lack
a usual source of care, to lack a personal doctor or nurse, to lack
family-centered care, and to have problematic specialty referrals.
- Over 90% of children
with non-English-speaking parents were Hispanic; disparities among
Hispanic children compared with other children were not significant.
The authors conclude that "the findings of this study emphasize the
need for outreach and identification of CSHCN whose families experience
language barriers that affect their children's access to care."
Yu SM, Nyman RM, Kogan MD, et al. 2004. Parent's language of interview
and access to care for children with special health care needs.
Ambulatory Pediatrics 4(2):181-187.
Readers: More information is available from the MCH Library's knowledge
paths, Children and Adolescents with Special Health Care Needs and
Child and Adolescent Health Insurance and Access to Care at http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/index.html;
from the bibliographies, Children with Special Health Care Needs and
Outreach Programs and Strategies, at http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/bibmenu.html;
and from the organizations resource list, Children with Special Health
Care Needs at http://www.mchlibrary.info/databases/orgmenu.html.
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert,
send an e-mail message to
mchalert@list.ncemch.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not
need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH
Alert, send an e-mail message to
mchalert@list.ncemch.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do
not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 2004 by
National Center for Education in Maternal and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
MCH Library Services at the National Center for Education in Maternal
and Child Health under its cooperative agreement (6U02 MC 00001) with
the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services
Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The
Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive,
and irrevocable right to use the work for federal purposes and to
authorize others to use the work for federal purposes.
Permission is given to
forward MCH Alert to individual
colleagues. For all other uses, requests for permission to
duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this
publication should be sent to MCH Alert Editor, National Center for
Education in Maternal and Child Health, at mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your
submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
EDITORS: Jolene
Bertness, Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR: Ruth
Barzel
National Center for
Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Mailing address: Box
571272, Washington, DC 20057-1272
Street address: 2115
Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 601, Washington,
DC 20007-2292
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/index.html
************************************************************